https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mujs-0-2.20150202gitc1ad1ba.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
--- Comment #10 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Thank you both.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mujs-0-2.20150202gitc1ad1ba.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mujs-0-2.20150202gitc1ad1ba.fc22
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
Is there any plan of mujs providing a shared library?
Not that I am aware.
Where does and MIT come from? Afaics, the package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #2)
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
Is there any plan of mujs providing a shared library?
Not that I am
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
--- Comment #6 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Okay, that makes sense.
Changed the license tag and added that definition for %{_docdir_fmt}.
Updated SPEC:
https://psabata.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/mujs/mujs.spec
Updated SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #2)
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
Is there any plan of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Where does and MIT come from? Afaics, the package is AGPL as a whole,
and
the only two things which could have a license are the executable and
the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1095455
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219422
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
17 matches
Mail list logo