https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
php-zordius-lightncandy-0.22-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
php-zordius-lightncandy-0.22-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
php-zordius-lightncandy-0.22-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
php-zordius-lightncandy-0.22-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5ee08d4b8c
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
php-zordius-lightncandy-0.22-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0df9649575
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #25 from Michael Cronenworth ---
New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/php-zordius-lightncandy.spec
New SRPM:
http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/php-zordius-lightncandy-0.22-2.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #19 from Michael Cronenworth ---
Yeah, there were some changes in PHPUnit that I have to work around. When I
created this review PHPUnit was a much older version... :/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #20 from Michael Cronenworth ---
New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/php-zordius-lightncandy.spec
New SRPM:
http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/php-zordius-lightncandy-0.22-1.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #22 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 1081401
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1081401=edit
phpci.log lightncandy-0.22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #24 from gil cattaneo ---
NON blocking issues:
[?]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/php/zordius
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #21 from gil cattaneo ---
have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243761 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #23 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #17 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
FPC has made the final ruling today and upheld the ability to use the SourceURL
that I am using.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|fed...@famillecollet.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #9 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #8)
From https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#Extensions_Requires
... on all of the dependent extensions ...
Fixed
The used URL is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #11 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
(In reply to Mathieu Bridon from comment #10)
As a result, Remi is correct, you should not use those URLs.
Bring it up with FPC to change it then.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #14 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
Arf, missed the important part in my quote:
For a number of reasons (immutability, availability, uniqueness), you must
use the full commit revision hash when referring to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #12 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org ---
(In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #11)
(In reply to Mathieu Bridon from comment #10)
As a result, Remi is correct, you should not use those URLs.
Bring it up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #15 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
The wording is being clarified to define how I explained it in comment 9.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2015-June/010739.html
If you want to wait for FPC to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #7 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #6)
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
see phpcompatinfo report, Missing
Requires: php-pcre php-spl php-reflection
Please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #8 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
(In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #7)
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #6)
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
see phpcompatinfo report, Missing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Created attachment 1039494
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1039494action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change: 2015-05-04
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Created attachment 1039490
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1039490action=edit
phpci-src.log
phpCompatInfo version 4.3.0 DB built Jun 16 2015 12:10:27 CEST static
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231318
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
35 matches
Mail list logo