https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
Mohamed El Morabity changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
Mohamed El Morabity changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #15 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
Looks like the review is stalled :(. I'm really interested in making pymssql
available for Fedora and EPEL. Can this review be set as dead?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #13 from Miroslav Suchý ---
> Are the py2_build/py3_build and py2_install/py3_install macros supported by
> the EPEL buildroots?
They are for sure for EPEL7. I did not try others.
> Unfortunately as the unit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #12 from Stefan Nuxoll ---
(In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #11)
> There should be no line after %description (otherwise the blank line goes to
> description as well). It should be:
> %description
> A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #11 from Miroslav Suchý ---
There should be no line after %description (otherwise the blank line goes to
description as well). It should be:
%description
A simple database ...
Instead of
%{__python2} setup.py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
snuxoll's scratch build of python-pymssql-2.1.1-1.fc24.src.rpm for f24
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12718180
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
Stefan Nuxoll changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Ping? Any progress?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
I believe there should be no blank line after %description.
Please use macros consistently
I.e. instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT please use %{buildroot}.
%{optflags} instead of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Nuxoll ste...@nuxoll.eu.org ---
Thanks, those are all present in the python template generated by
rpmdev-newspec, so I left them alone, I'll go ahead and correct them and post
an updated spec later today.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Nuxoll ste...@nuxoll.eu.org ---
I've run fedora-review against my packaged and realized the package license was
missing, I've resolved this issue.
Current spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
Stefan Nuxoll ste...@nuxoll.eu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||pymssql
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
Stefan Nuxoll ste...@nuxoll.eu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Nuxoll ste...@nuxoll.eu.org ---
Got the EPEL scratch build working with a patch to setup.py, the src rpm and
spec file linked have been updated with the changes:
EPEL7:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Nuxoll ste...@nuxoll.eu.org ---
I suppose I should note that this is my first package and that I will need a
sponsor.
This package has completed a successful Koji scratch build on:
Fedora 22:
18 matches
Mail list logo