https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
Jeff Backus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
Jeff Backus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Jeff B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
--- Comment #9 from Jeff Backus ---
Great, thanks Christopher!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
--- Comment #7 from Jeff Backus ---
Hi Christopher,
Upstream has released an update with the license included at the top of
argparse.lua. Here's the updated package:
* Spec: https://jsbackus.fedorapeople.org/lua-argparse/lua-argparse.spec
* S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
--- Comment #6 from Jeff Backus ---
Hi Christopher,
Thanks! Yes, comment 4 is *much* cleaner. :) I've made the requested changes.
Here's the updated package:
* Spec: https://jsbackus.fedorapeople.org/lua-argparse/lua-argparse.spec
* SRPM:
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible licen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng ---
You can use %{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc} at the top of the spec then
just use %license without issues.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
--- Comment #3 from Jeff Backus ---
Ahhh! Wrong package.
Koji Builds:
* F21: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10580403
* F22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10580409
* F23: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
--- Comment #2 from Jeff Backus ---
Hi Christopher,
Thanks for being willing to review my package! I found a couple of little
problems while tinkering with another package of mine, so I have updated the
spec to:
* Apply proper permissions to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Backus ---
Koji Builds:
* Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10471251
* F23: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10471257
* F22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246718
Jeff Backus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1246719
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
15 matches
Mail list logo
