[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2016-01-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 Jonny Heggheim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2016-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/java-scrypt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2016-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 --- Comment #8 from Jonny Heggheim --- Thanks for the review and the pointer. I have a question, since upstream have tagged the release, should I use the tag name or the commit hash? The Fedora wiki sugest this in the Git

[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2016-01-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced

[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2016-01-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2016-01-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2015-12-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jerboaa's scratch build of java-1.8.0-openjdk?#d28765c33d068af9ff432a92443b93beeef88a22 for

[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2015-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 --- Comment #4 from Jonny Heggheim --- Asked upstream to clearify the license by including a header in the source files. No feedback after 25 days. https://github.com/wg/scrypt/issues/34 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2015-08-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2015-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 Jonny Heggheim heg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841

[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2015-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 --- Comment #1 from Jonny Heggheim heg...@gmail.com --- I disabled jni since the C library is bundled from another project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to

[Bug 1251689] Review Request: java-scrypt - Java implementation of scrypt

2015-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251689 --- Comment #2 from Jonny Heggheim heg...@gmail.com --- Upstream informed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component