https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|1.3.1-2.fc21|1.3.1-2.fc23
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-lolex-1.3.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-lolex-1.3.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|1.3.1-2.fc22|1.3.1-2.fc21
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-lolex-1.3.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-lolex-1.3.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you
want to test the update, you can install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-lolex-1.3.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you
want to test the update, you can install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-lolex-1.3.1-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14803
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-lolex-1.3.1-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14802
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-lolex-1.3.1-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14801
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Pio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #5 from Piotr Popieluch ---
I only need the nodejs part at this moment. Browserify is not in Fedora and I
expect that it has many missing dependencies. I will look into browserify some
other time.
* Tue Sep 01 2015 Piotr Popieluc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes ---
I think the only question is whether we should ship the top level lolex.js or
just the one in src?
The top level one is intended for serving to browsers (it won't be used in node
if you require lolex) and is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #2 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Sorry, got a bit sloppy with copy+paste after xx node modules..
Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-lolex.spec
SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-lolex-1.3.1-1.fc22.src.rpm
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #1 from Tom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1258160
Referenced Bugs:
https://
25 matches
Mail list logo
