https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Kamil Páral changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #34 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?tas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state.
Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state.
Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state.
Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state.
Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
go-compilers-1-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b9da8834ba
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
go-compilers-1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state.
Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
go-compilers-1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state.
Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
go-compilers-1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want
to test the update, you can install it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #28 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
go-compilers-1-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15533
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
go-compilers-1-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15532
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
go-compilers-1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want
to test the update, you can install it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #24 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
go-compilers-1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15466
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
go-compilers-1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15464
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #20 from Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #19 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Thanks Jakub.
These could be fixed:
go-compilers.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-provides compiler(go-compiler)
go-compilers.src:28: W: unversioned-explicit-provides compiler(golang)
go-compilers.src:40:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Jakub Čajka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #18 from Jak
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Jakub Čajka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #17 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Added new macro go_compiler which if set to 1 means that virtual provide
compiler(go-compiler) is available. So distributions where there is no such
provide can BuildRequire implicit golang compiler.
Spe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state.
Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #16 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Again, minimized number of macros in macros.golang/gcc-go-compilers and
redefined gobuild/gotest:
macros.golang-compiler:
# Define commands for building
# BUILD_ID can be generated for golang build no ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #15 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Proposed form and use of ExclusiveArchs and BuildRequires for various
architectures and distributions with or without go-srpm-macros packaged.
https://github.com/ingvagabund/gofed/issues/29
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #14 from Jan Chaloupka ---
At the same time there will be no support for debug info with the current
definition of gobuild. Of course, the definition can be updated and generate
debuginfo no matter what (as defined and mentions in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #13 from Jan Chaloupka ---
What would the use of go-compilers and go-srpm-macros macros?
1)
%if 0%{?go_arches:1}
ExclusiveArch: %{go_arches}
%else
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm}
%endif
If not being optimistic, this will w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(vondruch@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(vondruch@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #10 from Jan Chaloupka ---
> And why are you creating platform specific subpackages? They are never created
> both on single platform if I understand it correctly, so what is the point
> then?
So I can provide compiler(gcc-go) and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #8)
The downside is that you have to replace/expand the %{golang_build},
%{gcc_go_build}, %{golang_test} and %{gcc_go_test} macros in the template, but
that is still pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch ---
I would also suggest to include the "macros.go-compilers" files as a SOURCE
instead creating them on the fly. One could easier compare them with current
state for example and you can save some escaping ...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #7 from Vít Ondruch ---
And why are you creating platform specific subpackages? They are never created
both on single platform if I understand it correctly, so what is the point
then?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #5 from Jan Chaloupka ---
As it stands, go-srpm-macros can not be removed from minimal buildroot if
%{go_arches} macro is about to be used with ExclusiveArch. Reasoning:
Building of rpm has three phases:
1) generate srpm on a rand
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #4 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Plus gobuild and gotest macros takes only -o option. For other options rpm
reports an error but the building phase continue without any problems. At this
point only -o option is relevant as it is common fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #3 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Correction: it is 'unset -f', not 'undef -f'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Updated definition of gobuild and gotest
- added 'undef -f gobuild' and 'undef -f gotest' so both functions are not
redefined if %gobuild/%gotest macros are used multi times.
Besides, the correct use of b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
--- Comment #1 from Jan Chaloupka ---
After discussion with Jakub, compile.sh removed, definition of gobuild and
gotest moved to macros. macros.go-compilers now contains:
%gobuild() \
function gobuild { \
local LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:-} -B 0x$(he
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fpoko...@redhat.com,
48 matches
Mail list logo
