https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
protozero-1.2.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
protozero-1.2.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
protozero-1.2.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
protozero-1.2.2-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-582a04ec39
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/protozero
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Mohamed El Morabity changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #10 from Tom Hughes ---
Something else seems to be dragging in graphviz for me, but an explicit require
is definitely a good idea, so I've added it:
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/protozero.spec
SRPM URL: http://download
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Mohamed El Morabity changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from Mo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Mohamed El Morabity changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|i...@cicku.me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #8 from Tom Hughes ---
Update to new upstream version. The dependencies are all in rawhide now, so if
you could take another look at this that would be much appreciated:
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/protozero.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Bug 1260375 depends on bug 1264485, which changed state.
Bug 1264485 Summary: Review Request: catch - A modern, C++-native, header-only,
framework for unit-tests, TDD and BDD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264485
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #7 from Tom Hughes ---
Update to new upstream version:
Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/protozero.spec
SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/protozero-1.2.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1264485
--- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #5 from Tom Hughes ---
Urgh. That header of course has come from https://github.com/philsquared/Catch
so I probably need to open a review for that to unbundle it which will also
resolve any licensing concerns.
I was aware of the o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Marcin Juszkiewicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjusz...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Anything more I can do here to help move this along?
Happy to do one or two of yours in return, but your web server doesn't seem to
be working so I can't download any of them...
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
There's no endianess issue as that file is only use on big endian machines. On
little endian machines the layer above (see pbf_reader.hpp for example) just
does a memcpy instead. I've tested it with a scratch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng ---
1. SERIOUS: ExcludeArch. It doesn't support big endian! Don't forget MIPS,
since MIPS is going to be added as a secondary arch.
https://github.com/mapbox/protozero/blob/master/include/protozero/byteswa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
23 matches
Mail list logo
