https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
opennlp-1.5.3-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
Bug 1261019 depends on bug 1261017, which changed state.
Bug 1261017 Summary: Review Request: jwnl - Java API for accessing the WordNet
relational dictionary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261017
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
opennlp-1.5.3-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-d535f8eecf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from gil c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #7)
> If you have no plans to ship a F21 / F22 package, OK, but I imagine you will.
this package is only for F23 and rawhide
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #7 from Michael Cronenworth ---
If you have no plans to ship a F21 / F22 package, OK, but I imagine you will.
If the new Java package tools will not be shipped for F21/F22 you will need to
carry a if block for them.
%if 0%{?fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #5)
> > > > * MUST: pom.xml files are not installed.
> > > idem for this
>
> I see the fedora-review check doesn't see the files have been renamed to
> "opennl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #5 from Michael Cronenworth ---
> > > * MUST: pom.xml files are not installed.
> > idem for this
I see the fedora-review check doesn't see the files have been renamed to
"opennlp.pom", etc. You may ignore this one.
The only outst
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #4 from Michael Cronenworth ---
@gil, I know what I'm doing. Please see the fedora-review output:
> Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> Require list are managed by our java tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Note: run fedora-review -b [BUG NUMBER] --plugins Java -m fedora-rawhide-[YOUR
PREFERRED ARCH]
and install fedora-review-plugin-java package to get a more comprehensive java
review
Spec URL: https://gil.fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #1)
> ==ISSUES==
> * MUST: Sub-package maxent does not include license text. Either provide it
> or place a Requires: on a package that does. Uima requires -too
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
--- Comment #1 from Michael Cronenworth ---
==ISSUES==
* MUST: Sub-package maxent does not include license text. Either provide it or
place a Requires: on a package that does. Uima requires -tools so that
sub-package is OK.
http://fedoraproj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1146661
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261019
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1261017
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
23 matches
Mail list logo
