https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
Bug 1262157 depends on bug 1262158, which changed state.
Bug 1262158 Summary: Review Request: jackcess - Java library for reading from
and writing to MS Access databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262158
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
jackcess-encrypt-2.1.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
jackcess-encrypt-2.1.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-67b1d16e52
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #3 from Michael Cronenworth ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> Please, review this before
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262158
> thanks in advance
I will review it. FYI: You may use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #4 from Michael Cronenworth ---
The build completed when I built against jackcess-2.1.0 (as indicated by the
build log).
I will continue with the jackcess review of 2.1.2, but you will need to modify
this package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #6 from Michael Cronenworth ---
This package (jackcess-encrypt) requires jackcess = 2.1.0 to build. If you want
to package the 2.1.2 version of jackcess this package will need to be patched
to build against it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #8)
> (In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #7)
> > Sorry, this one too:
> >
> >
> > com.healthmarketscience.jackcess
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #7)
> Sorry, this one too:
>
>
> com.healthmarketscience.jackcess
> jackcess
> 2.1.0
>
Is not necessary, our
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #4)
> The build completed when I built against jackcess-2.1.0 (as indicated by the
> build log).
>
> I will continue with the jackcess
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #7 from Michael Cronenworth ---
Sorry, this one too:
com.healthmarketscience.jackcess
jackcess
2.1.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #10 from Michael Cronenworth ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #8)
> Is not necessary, our java tools, does not check the required libraries
> version
I always assume to test against all Fedora versions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
... and in second time to http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xmvn.git/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
when i talk of "our java tools" mainly i refer to
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/javapackages-tools.git/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Please, review this before https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262158
thanks in advance
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
--- Comment #1 from Michael Cronenworth ---
I am unable to build the SRPM. I have jackcess-2.1.2-1.fc24.noarch being pulled
in the mock build.
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1146661
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262157
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1262158
27 matches
Mail list logo