Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Dominique Martinet has canceled Package Review
's request for Dominique Martinet
's needinfo:
Bug 1268010: Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
Dominique Martinet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
Package Review changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(dominique.martine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt ---
> This is purely personal but I don't like the official guideline for git
> snapshot version so I'm going back to release (I did upstream release 1.0
> for these packages so it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for epel7-candidate
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for epel7-candidate
failed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #14 from Dominique Martinet ---
Hmm, I knew I was in the middle of something so this isn't what I wanted to
push but this is weird, the same srpm does mock build on my laptop... Ohwell,
will teach me to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for f24 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11788301
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for f23 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11788334
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for el6-candidate
failed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
> Hmm I wonder why I added the .la there, if anything it should
> have been in the -devel...
No, that would break the purpose of those files,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
Oh, as I just saw this:
> http://asmadeus.notk.org/CEA/libmooshika-1.0-4.g3bde2d1.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-4.g3bde2d1.fc22.src.rpm for epel7
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #6 from Dominique Martinet ---
Thanks for confirming.
Here are the new specfile and src.rpm:
http://asmadeus.notk.org/CEA/libmooshika-1.0-4.g3bde2d1.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #3 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Dominique Martinet from comment #2)
> Hmm I'll admit I didn't even try to build on EPEL5, will remove it.
Group does no harm, but some reviewers object to it being
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
Dave Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
--- Comment #2 from Dominique Martinet ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #1)
> * I don't know if you want to support it, but the Group tag is only
> needed for EPEL5;
Hmm I'll admit I didn't even try to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010
Dominique Martinet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
19 matches
Mail list logo