needinfo canceled: [Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2020-07-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Dominique Martinet has canceled Package Review 's request for Dominique Martinet 's needinfo: Bug 1268010: Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #18

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2020-07-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 Dominique Martinet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2020-07-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 Package Review changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(dominique.martine

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-12-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt --- > This is purely personal but I don't like the official guideline for git > snapshot version so I'm going back to release (I did upstream release 1.0 > for these packages so it

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for epel7-candidate completed

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for epel7-candidate failed

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #14 from Dominique Martinet --- Hmm, I knew I was in the middle of something so this isn't what I wanted to push but this is weird, the same srpm does mock build on my laptop... Ohwell, will teach me to

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for f24 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11788301 --

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for f23 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11788334 --

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for el6-candidate failed

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-10-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) --- > Hmm I wonder why I added the .la there, if anything it should > have been in the -devel... No, that would break the purpose of those files,

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-10-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) --- Oh, as I just saw this: > http://asmadeus.notk.org/CEA/libmooshika-1.0-4.g3bde2d1.spec

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-10-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-4.g3bde2d1.fc22.src.rpm for epel7 completed

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-10-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #6 from Dominique Martinet --- Thanks for confirming. Here are the new specfile and src.rpm: http://asmadeus.notk.org/CEA/libmooshika-1.0-4.g3bde2d1.spec

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #3 from Dave Love --- (In reply to Dominique Martinet from comment #2) > Hmm I'll admit I didn't even try to build on EPEL5, will remove it. Group does no harm, but some reviewers object to it being

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 Dave Love changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #2 from Dominique Martinet --- (In reply to Dave Love from comment #1) > * I don't know if you want to support it, but the Group tag is only > needed for EPEL5; Hmm I'll admit I didn't even try to

[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA

2015-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 Dominique Martinet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841