https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Bug 1270322 depends on bug 1270368, which changed state.
Bug 1270368 Summary: Review Request: nacl-arm-gcc - Various compilers (C, C++)
for nacl (ARM)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270368
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #21 from Raphael Groner ---
How Nvidia breaks Chrome Incognito
https://charliehorse55.wordpress.com/2016/01/09/how-nvidia-breaks-chrome-incognito/
Sorry if that's offtopic to the review in general, but it's IMHO a security
issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #22 from Heiko Adams ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #21)
> How Nvidia breaks Chrome Incognito
>
> https://charliehorse55.wordpress.com/2016/01/09/how-nvidia-breaks-chrome-
> incognito/
>
> Sorry if that's offtopic t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #23 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Heiko Adams from comment #22)
> (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #21)
> > How Nvidia breaks Chrome Incognito
> >
> > https://charliehorse55.wordpress.com/2016/01/09/how-nvidia-break
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Bug 1270322 depends on bug 1270355, which changed state.
Bug 1270355 Summary: Review Request: nacl-binutils - A GNU collection of binary
utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Bug 1270322 depends on bug 1270324, which changed state.
Bug 1270324 Summary: Chromium needs libusb_interrupt_handle_event exposed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270324
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
New SRPM: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-48.0.2564.116-3.fc24.src.rpm
New SPEC: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium.spec
Adds chrome-remote-desktop subpackage, Requires: u2f-hidraw-polic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Bug 1270322 depends on bug 1270375, which changed state.
Bug 1270375 Summary: Review Request: nacl-arm-newlib - C library intended for
use on embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270375
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Bug 1270322 depends on bug 1270358, which changed state.
Bug 1270358 Summary: Review Request: nacl-newlib - C library intended for use
on embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Bug 1270322 depends on bug 1270357, which changed state.
Bug 1270357 Summary: Review Request: nacl-gcc - Various compilers (C, C++) for
nacl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
What|Removed |Ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #25 from Neal Gompa ---
@Tom,
I see this bit in the spec:
> %if 0
> # see https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=501318
> BuildRequires:libsrtp-devel >= 1.4.4
> %endif
The conditional looks like it would al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #26 from Jorge Martínez López ---
Sorry to be slightly off-topic: the last upgrade of re2 from
20131024-5.fc23.x86_64 to 20160401-2.fc23.x86_64 in the COPR repository makes
Chromim crash. Where can I report it?
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #27 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
You can either rollback re2 to the previous release or wait for this build to
finish in the copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/spot/chromium/build/182130/
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #28 from Jorge Martínez López ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #27)
> You can either rollback re2 to the previous release or wait for this build
> to finish in the copr:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #29 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to Jorge Martínez López from comment #28)
> (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #27)
> > You can either rollback re2 to the previous release or wait for this build
> > to finish
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #30 from Jorge Martínez López ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #29)
> (In reply to Jorge Martínez López from comment #28)
> > (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #27)
> > > You can either rollback re2 to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
guoxiao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guo888x...@gmail.com,
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tcallawa@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|chromium|
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #31 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
*sigh* Okay. I'm doing a debugging build locally now to try to figure out
what's breaking this. I'll try to look at it some more this weekend, but I make
no promises. :/
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #32 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Jorge, are you running Fedora 23 or 24?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #33 from Jorge Martínez López ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #32)
> Jorge, are you running Fedora 23 or 24?
23 x86_64.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #34 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Okay, this is filed upstream:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=608205
If anyone on CC here has experience in debugging stack smashing, I would
appreciate help. I tried, and all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #35 from Gary Gatling ---
Any interest in moving to using "gn" for builds? I notice this rpm package
still uses "gyp."
I ask because of these posts to the packaging mailing list: "We're going to
start shutting off GYP soon"
https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #36 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to Gary Gatling from comment #35)
*sigh*. Patches or liquor accepted.
Lemme get a working build first, then I'll see about gn.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #37 from Adam Goode ---
Are you subscribed to chromium-packagers? It's a few messages per month and is
the primary announce/discussion list for downstream distributions.
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!forum/chrom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #38 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to Adam Goode from comment #37)
> Are you subscribed to chromium-packagers? It's a few messages per month and
> is the primary announce/discussion list for downstream distributions.
>
> h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #39 from Adam Goode ---
Ok, let me know if you need help with patches for Chromium stuff. I've done a
few recently for fixes with use_sysroot=false:
https://codereview.chromium.org/1699713002/
https://codereview.chromium.org/16712
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #40 from Tomas Popela ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #36)
> *sigh*. Patches or liquor accepted.
>
> Lemme get a working build first, then I'll see about gn.
I will do the work as I should have a branch somewher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #41 from Tomas Popela ---
Also I should note, that the status of the GN is not that great for building
with out of tree builds (from tarballs) as you can see in [0]. Actually it was
the reason why I didn't complete the previous wor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kon...@tylerc.org
--- Comment #42 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #43 from Conrad Meyer ---
re2-20131024-5.fc23.x86_64 resolves the chromium-48.0.2564.116-2.fc23.x86_64
crash for now. (re2-20160401-2.fc23.x86_64 caused crash on startup.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #44 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
I'm pushing new packages to the "old" stable repo now that will work with the
new re2 package update. The copr already has those builds.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
abrouw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abrouw...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
John Florian changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jflor...@doubledog.org
--- Comment #46
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #47 from Jorge Martínez López ---
Yep, Chromium in F24 is pretty much broken, I see the pages loading and upon
finishing I get the "Aw, snap" page. I managed to rescue this trace but I don't
think it's very informative:
[1:1:0621/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rosser@gmail.com
--- Comment #48 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Tobias Guggenmos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tobias.guggen...@posteo.net
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #50 from Gary Gatling ---
I ran into this problem with a chromium I built. If I ran the fedora 23 binary
on fedora 24 it worked. If I ran the fedora 24 binary it crashed with a "Aw,
snap" after pretty much every page load.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
dalefarm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dalef...@gmail.com
--- Comment #51 from da
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #52 from Rex Dieter ---
spot, mind giving a fresh/updated spec/srpm urls?
I strongly suspect the links from comment #5 aren't current anymore.
This?
https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-52.0.2743.60-1.fc24.src.rpm
zbyszek, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #53 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
You can review off that SRPM. It's technically not a stable release of Chromium
(it's in their "beta" tag at the moment), but since 51 doesn't work right at
all with Fedora 24, I had to push somethi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|zbys...@in.waw.pl |rdie...@math.unl.edu
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #55 from Rex Dieter ---
Thanks, and I'll use recent copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/spot/chromium/build/375281/
for reference. note build fails on rawhide apparently due to some api
differences in rawhide's cu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #56 from Rex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||chromium
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #57 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/chromium
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System ---
chromium-52.0.2743.82-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a9adbe000
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #59 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System ---
chromium-52.0.2743.82-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Bug 1270322 depends on bug 1270405, which changed state.
Bug 1270405 Summary: Review Request: chromium-native_client - Google Native
Client Toolchain
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1270324
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1270355
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1270357
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1270358
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1270364
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1270368
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1270375
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1270405
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
SPEC URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium.spec
SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-45.0.2454.101-1.fc23.src.rpm
That spec is now cleaned up. In the process of making 45.0.2454.10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
SPEC URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium.spec
SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-46.0.2490.71-1.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
So I just took a quick look at the spec, and I'm curious about this:
""
# Once upon a time, we tried to split these out... but that's not worth the
effort anymore.
Provides:chromium-ffmpegsum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3)
> So I just took a quick look at the spec, and I'm curious about this:
>
> ""
> # Once upon a time, we tried to split these out... but that's not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
SPEC URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium.spec
SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-46.0.2490.80-1.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
@Tom: I think it would be valuable to split ffmpegsumo back out, if it's
possible.
From what I've observed, the usage of Chrome is pretty much because we don't
provide Chromium. I think it would be a disserv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
It looks like they (Chromium upstream) gutted all of their stub generation code
for loading shared library dependencies like ffmpegsumo. I'm not comfortable
carrying that patchset indefinitely to sup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #8 from Neal Gompa ---
It doesn't appear to be that way. I've seen SUSE and Ubuntu pull this off,
while Mageia goes a step further and makes it work with the system ffmpeg.
SUSE's version of the chromium browser is at 46.0.2490.71
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
New SRPM: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-46.0.2490.80-2.fc23.src.rpm
New SPEC: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium.spec
I didn't put the "clean" ffmpegsumo in a subpackage, because at thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #10)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #6)
> > From what I've observed, the usage of Chrome is pretty much because we don't
> > provide Chromium.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #11)
> (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #6)
> > > From what I've observed, the usage of Chrome is p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Rather than try to wrangle with nacl for i686, I've simply disabled
native_client support in chromium for that architecture, and added i686 to the
ExclusiveArch list.
New SRPM: https://spot.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
--- Comment #14 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #15 from gil cattaneo ---
sorry, i meant tried
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #16 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #14)
> hi
> amazing work
> have tired to use libphonenumber-7.1.1
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200115 istead of
> bundled(libphonenumber) = s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Andy Lutomirski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@kernel.org
--- Comment #17 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to Andy Lutomirski from comment #17)
> At the risk of adding a complication that isn't quite ready yet: Chromium
> supports u2f tokens, but it won't work due to permission issues out of th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Ivan Afonichev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivan.afonic...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #20 from Andy Lutomirski ---
u2f-hidraw-policy is now in f22 and f23 stable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Bug 1270322 depends on bug 1270364, which changed state.
Bug 1270364 Summary: Review Request: nacl-arm-binutils - A GNU collection of
binary utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270364
What|Removed
83 matches
Mail list logo