[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1269538 (IoT) | Referenced

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1387531

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 Bug 1273150 depends on bug 1299843, which changed state. Bug 1299843 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-buffertools - Working with node.js buffers made easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299843 What|Removed

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-only-shallow -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 --- Comment #7 from Jared Smith --- Updated. The dependency nodejs-buffertools was just recently approved, so it'll be going into rawhide shortly. Spec URL:

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jsmith's scratch build of nodejs-only-shallow-1.2.0-3.fc24.src.rpm for f24-nodejs4 failed

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 --- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes --- Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-only-shallow/nodejs-only-shallow.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 --- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes --- You added the license file as SOURCE1 but you're not actually including it in the build package. The require on nodejs is also unnecessary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 --- Comment #5 from Tom Hughes --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 --- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes --- License file is missing, so you need to ask upstream about that, and probably include it locally until upstream provide it (I think ISC requires a copy). Tests don't actually need to be

[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806