https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #26 from Andrew Morton ---
Wrapping up my end of things...
Andy confirmed that my gnubby key is an old one which doesn't fully implement
the U2F HID spec. Here's his fix (which worked for me) (thanks)
Like this, but double-ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can ins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #22 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-a1ed069ab8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-fc49e8ae43
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/u2f-hidraw-policy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
Seth Jennings changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #18 from S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #17 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
amluto's scratch build of u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc22.src.rpm for f22
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11644428
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #16 from Andy Lutomirski ---
I'm reasonably confident that udev uses inotify to notice changes, so the
scriptlet isn't needed. I switched to using _udevrulesdir, and I updated to a
new upstream version with your install -d fix (an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #15 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
amluto's scratch build of u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc22.src.rpm for f22 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11644400
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
amluto's scratch build of u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc22.src.rpm for f22 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11644284
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #13 from Seth Jennings ---
Just a couple things:
- Add systemd as a BuildRequires then you can use %_udevrulesdir to refer
to the udev rules path
- Add %udev_rules_update in a new %post section
My fedora-review matches yours so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
Seth Jennings changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spartacu...@gmail.com
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #12 from Norman Smith ---
I didn't get a good copy for comment 11. Sorry about that.
$ udevadm monitor --property
monitor will print the received events for:
UDEV - the event which udev sends out after rule processing
KERNEL - t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
Norman Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bog...@bellsouth.net
--- Comment #11 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #10 from Andy Lutomirski ---
I'm guessing that your device is a "gnubby", which is possibly complaint with
the U2F crypto spec but may not be compliant with the U2F HID spec [1], which
is what u2f-hidraw-policy is for.
For referen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Morton ---
doh, I had hiddev and hidraw confused.
t61p:/home/akpm> grep hidraw log-chrome
7882 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/class/hidraw",
O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = 223
7882 readlink("/sys/class/hidra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Morton ---
I straced the whole operation (start chrome, try to authenticate).
t61p:/home/akpm> grep hiddev log-chrome
7882 readlink("/sys/class/usbmisc/hiddev0",
"../../devices/pci:00/:00"..., 1024
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #7 from Andy Lutomirski ---
That's weird -- your system doesn't seem to be enumerating it as a hidraw
device at all. You could try to figure out what device node Chrome is opening.
I'm going to see if I can get myself an example
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Morton ---
udevadm monitor --property:
monitor will print the received events for:
UDEV - the event which udev sends out after rule processing
KERNEL - the kernel uevent
KERNEL[77193.141965] add /devices/pci00
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #5 from Andy Lutomirski ---
Can you unplug it, then start udevadm monitor --property, then plug it in, then
post whatever it says here?
The output of ls -l /dev/hidraw* with the key plugged in could also help.
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
Andrew Morton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@linux-foundation.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
amluto's scratch build of u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.1-1.fc22.src.rpm for f22
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11506303
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #2 from Andy Lutomirski ---
Whoops, I had the LICENSE file for the wrong license!
Spec URL:
http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/u2f-hidraw-policy-2/u2f-hidraw-policy.spec
SRPM URL:
http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/u2f-hidraw-poli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
amluto's scratch build of u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for f22
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11505737
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
29 matches
Mail list logo
