[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System --- codec2-0.5-1.el7, freedv-1.1-5.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-02-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System --- codec2-0.5-1.el7 freedv-1.1-5.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-d007a8affa -- You are

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #18 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- sagitter's scratch build of freedv-1.1-4.fc22.src.rpm for f23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12633479 -- You

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #17 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- sagitter's scratch build of freedv-1.1-4.fc22.src.rpm for epel7 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12633419 -- You

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #20 from Richard Shaw --- Thanks for the thorough review and patience! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/freedv -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-86353fa95c -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- freedv-1.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a8343a0e9 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System --- codec2-0.5-1.el7, freedv-1.1-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande --- appstream-util check is failed. Add dconf as BuildRequires and Requires package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #16 from Richard Shaw --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15) > appstream-util check is failed. > Add dconf as BuildRequires and Requires package. Turns out it just didn't like my use of . It still

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2016-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #14 from Richard Shaw --- SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv.spec SRPM: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv-1.1-4.fc22.src.rpm * Wed Jan 20 2016 Richard Shaw -

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #12) > Hardened builds are required for all packages: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages It's not required as

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #12 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #10) > Ok, I've taken care of the sox issue but I'm not exactly sure what to do > about PIC/PIE... Since freedv is not a daemon or "long

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #10 from Richard Shaw --- Ok, I've taken care of the sox issue but I'm not exactly sure what to do about PIC/PIE... Since freedv is not a daemon or "long running application" I'm not sure full RELO is

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #11 from Richard Shaw --- Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv-1.1-3.fc22.src.rpm * Tue Dec 8 2015 Richard Shaw

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #9 from Richard Shaw --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #7) > - A temporary bundling of Sox libraries is permitted but you cannot download > Sox during build process, i think. You're right, I

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande --- > 'freedv' executable file results Not PIE, Partial RELRO. Some compiler/linker > flags are missing. - 'freedv' executable file is 'Not PIE, Partial RELRO'. Some compiler/linker

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande --- - A temporary bundling of Sox libraries is permitted but you cannot download Sox during build process, i think. - 'freedv' executable file results Not PIE, Partial RELRO. Some

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande --- Linking fails: /builddir/build/BUILD/freedv-1.1/src/sox_biquad.c:97: undefined reference to `lsx_biquad_flow' /builddir/build/BUILD/freedv-1.1/src/sox_biquad.c:97: undefined

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #5 from Richard Shaw --- Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv-1.1-2.fc21.src.rpm * Fri Dec 4 2015 Richard Shaw

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw --- Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/freedv-1.1-2.fc22.src.rpm Fixed dist tag in the link since I've upgraded Fedora

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #4 from Richard Shaw --- Darn, I forgot about that. With the sox 14.4.2 release they made a bunch of previously public functions private. The only workaround for now is bundling sox which I don't want to do

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1278638] Review Request: freedv - FreeDV Digital Voice

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278638 --- Comment #2 from Richard Shaw --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1) > %if 0%{?fedora} > 21 > BuildRequires: speexdsp-devel > %else I'll probably leave it in for one release as someone may want to build