https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #20 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/letsencrypt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #18 from James Hogarth ---
Spec URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt-0.1.0-2.fc23.src.rpm
As discussed no python3 as it's not supp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #17 from Robert Buchholz ---
(In reply to James Hogarth from comment #14)
> Let's keep the focus on Fedora 24 in this review and once that's sorted we
> can track the EPEL packaging in an EPEL specific bug or the epel-devel
> maili
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #16 from James Hogarth ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #15)
> - Please also build the python3 subpackage
>
On my last tests %py3_build failed to build as is and seeing as upstream
doesn't support anything
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
- Please also build the python3 subpackage
- What about the docs? Shouldn't they be built?
(python-repoze-sphinx-autointerface.noarch seems to be required, and
$PATH has to be set to i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #14 from James Hogarth ---
(In reply to Robert Buchholz from comment #13)
> James and everyone else, thank you for your effort.
>
> I've been wading through the steps necessary to get this running on EPEL.
> I'm not sure this may
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #13 from Robert Buchholz ---
James and everyone else, thank you for your effort.
I've been wading through the steps necessary to get this running on EPEL. I'm
not sure this may be a discussion to be had in a new bug report specifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #12 from James Hogarth ---
Right package updated for the open beta ...
Spec URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt-0.1.0-1.fc23.src.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #11 from James Hogarth ---
With python-acme being inserted in my mock chroot whilst building and testing
this it polluted the environment a bit ...
There's python libraries missing from BuildRequires to get tests in %check to
pass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #10 from James Hogarth ---
Spec URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt-0.0.0-4.dev20151123.fc23.src.rpm
One quick change - the python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #9 from James Hogarth ---
Spec URL: https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jhogarth.fedorapeople.org/letsencrypt/letsencrypt-0.0.0-3.dev20151123.fc23.src.rpm
I've used this within the mock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to James Hogarth from comment #7)
> That new spec will be uploaded a little later on today when I've had a
> chance to test a bit more.
Great, I'll review it than.
> I've requested
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
Bug 1287193 depends on bug 1286324, which changed state.
Bug 1286324 Summary: Review Request: python-acme - Python libraries for use of
the ACME protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286324
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #7 from James Hogarth ---
(In reply to Till Maas from comment #3)
> (In reply to James Hogarth from comment #2)
> > Following from the discussion in the other bug wouldn't this be better named
> > python-letsencrypt to follow the g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #6 from Till Maas ---
Zbigniew, please go ahead with the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
letsencrypt seem to be the best option. It matches the upstream URL, pypi
package name, executable name, and the python module name.
It seems only python2 is supported, although python3 is a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
20 matches
Mail list logo
