https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
Dmitry Mikhirev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/dlib
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Dmitry Mikhirev from comment #10)
> > The "and Public Domain" part only applies to the examples.
> There are also data files under CC-BY-SA. I added them to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
A couple of reviews:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279112#c1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293735#c6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
Thank you Zbigniew!
> The "and Public Domain" part only applies to the examples.
There are also data files under CC-BY-SA. I added them to -doc package too as
well as license.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
Hi Cristopher!
I'm sorry, I had to search for duplicates better... We can cooperate working on
thiis package. Unfortunately your spec and srpm files are currently
unavailable. Was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #8 from Igor Gnatenko ---
*** Bug 969631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
Thank you for the review!
I hope I fixed everything, but probably I misunterstood you and used too
complicated way to remove dotfiles from documentation. Is it possible to do it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
In the %description, please say what kind of a software library it is, and what
algorithms it offers (not an exhaustive list, but a few words of overview). The
description
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #1)
> -> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> should be: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
Thnk you! Fixed.
>
> -> install -m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
Dmitry Mikhirev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko ---
Unformal quick review because NEEDSPONSOR:
-> Requires:%{name} = %{version}-%{release}
should be: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
-> install -m 755
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
Dmitry Mikhirev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
17 matches
Mail list logo