https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-flake8-import-order-0.6.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-flake8-import-order-0.6.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1afa7a3d77
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-flake8-import-order
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #7 from Ville Skyttä ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #6)
> can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289726
Will do probably tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from gil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #5 from Ville Skyttä ---
Thanks for the review.
License file inclusion already reported upstream:
https://github.com/public/flake8-import-order/pull/52
Rest of the license stuff reported as well, ASL 2.0 is almost certainly a bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
> found: "
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
... forgot remove unnecessary "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in install section
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
(NON blocking) Issues:
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is inclu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
14 matches
Mail list logo
