https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
xss-lock-0.3.0-4.20140302git.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
xss-lock-0.3.0-4.20140302git.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #23 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
xss-lock-0.3.0-4.20140302git.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1e35732096
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
xss-lock-0.3.0-4.20140302git.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-bdb30b18c7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xss-lock
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #19 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
I have sponsored you in the Fedora packagers group. Welcome! Please follow the
process from:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #18 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #17 from Martin Ueding ---
> [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
That is fixed now as by your suggestion.
> [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
This one does not help me that much. Is that implie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #16 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
According to the current contributor agreement (which you have already signed),
the default license for code contributions is MIT, so the copyright statement
on the top of the spec looks just fine. Note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #15 from Martin Ueding ---
In order to get it to work I have to use characters 0 to 12:
%global commit0 1e158fb20108058dbd62bd51d8e8c003c0a48717
%global shortcommit0 %(c=%{commit0}; echo ${c:0:12})
As far as I understand
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #14 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
(In reply to Martin Ueding from comment #13)
> In response to gil (#7):
>
> > %global commit0 1e158fb
> > %global shortcommit0 %(c=%{commit0}; echo ${c:0:11})
>
> I only got it to work with the follow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #13 from Martin Ueding ---
In response to gil (#7):
> %global commit0 1e158fb
> %global shortcommit0 %(c=%{commit0}; echo ${c:0:11})
I only got it to work with the following:
%global commit0 1e158fb20108
%global shortcom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #11)
> Let me recommend slowing down with the review a bit.
>
>
> > Please, remove:
> > %define checkout 20140302git
>
> During review, while it is good to poi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt ---
Let me recommend slowing down with the review a bit.
> Please, remove:
> %define checkout 20140302git
During review, while it is good to point at the guidelines, in this case the
guidelines don't fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
Ops ... you use a pre-relase (?). you must explain, in the SPEC, the why of
this choice
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 087
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=087&action=edit
spec file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
... forgot, use
%prep
%setup -qn raymonad-%{name}-%{shortcommit0}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and comp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Martin Ueding from comment #4)
> Hi Gil,
>
> thank you for the constructive feedback!
>
> - I changed the `Release` to include the leading zero.
this is not a pre-release than you should use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #6 from Martin Ueding ---
Certainly! This is the new SRPM URL:
http://chaos.stw-bonn.de/users/mu/uploads/tmp/2016-01-02/xss-lock-0.3.0-0.1.20140302git.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #5 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
Could you please update the SRPM URL as well?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #4 from Martin Ueding ---
Hi Gil,
thank you for the constructive feedback!
- I changed the `Release` to include the leading zero.
- Regarding the `%license` I am not so sure what I should exactly do with it.
Is it correct to a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
add a comment in SPEC how generate the taraball
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
about hardcode path in SPEC
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295144
Martin Ueding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced B
31 matches
Mail list logo
