https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01e318faa8
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01e318faa8
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6066d67c0c
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #28 from Denis Fateyev ---
Looked at the current version in rawhide. Just a small nit-pick:
1) Please use "install -Dpm 0644 doc/man/man3/msgpuck.h.3*
%{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man3/" instead of "cp -f" to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #29 from Roman Tsisyk ---
> 1) Please use "install -Dpm 0644 doc/man/man3/msgpuck.h.3*
> %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man3/" instead of "cp -f" to preserve files timestamps;
Good catch. Thanks!
> 2) Though I'm not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #30 from Denis Fateyev ---
(In reply to Roman Tsisyk from comment #29)
> > 2) Though I'm not really insisting, but pointing out full BRs is according
> > the current guidelines. As pointed above, you should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #20 from Roman Tsisyk ---
> (In reply to Roman Tsisyk from comment #16)
> > Is it possible to run the same automated tests before pushing to master?
If you submit an update then a bunch of tests are run
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #19 from Denis Fateyev ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #18)
> > 3) The recent guidelines require to specify all build requirements for new
> > packages (in your case: make, coreutils,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #18 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #17)
> (In reply to Roman Tsisyk from comment #16)
> > Is it possible to run the same automated tests before pushing to master?
If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #26 from Roman Tsisyk ---
Spec renamed, BR fixed.
I opened #1301720 for %cmake + GNUInstallDirs.cmake problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #23 from Denis Fateyev ---
(In reply to Roman Tsisyk from comment #22)
> > If you're going to maintain el6, then better keep this workaround.
> At least, until the situation with recently introduced `%license`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #22 from Roman Tsisyk ---
> If you're going to maintain el6, then better keep this workaround.
At least, until the situation with recently introduced `%license` support in
el6 is settled.
I use the same spec to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #24 from Roman Tsisyk ---
> If you're working with el6, just keep it. I thought you were using only
> epel7 and above.
Yes, I build el6 (actually centos6) packages for a non-official repository.
So I tried to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #25 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #19)
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #18)
> > > 3) The recent guidelines require to specify all build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.1-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ee5102307f
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #16 from Roman Tsisyk ---
> build...@fedoraproject.org
> msgpuck has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> msgpuck-devel-1.0.1-1.fc24.x86_64 requires msgpuck(x86-64) =
> 0:1.0.1-1.fc24
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4a0bbb7dfa
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4a0bbb7dfa
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
msgpuck-1.0.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b7b90d9f1f
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/msgpuck
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #9 from Roman Tsisyk ---
>Provides: msgpuck-static = %{version}-%{release}
to the devel subpackage
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries_2].
Already:
%package devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #6 from Roman Tsisyk ---
A new version.
Spec URL:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/rtsisyk/5bbce59a5a9954df8039/raw/2a5d454df4af66d6580bbd03c8ab931bf0b683af/msgpuck-1.0.1.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #5 from Roman Tsisyk ---
Status update:
I've made all review fixes and I plan push the updated version of spec after
finishing with the lua-fun #1295209. I need to get some experience and finish
with the one
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #3 from Roman Tsisyk ---
> I think you should remove the "main" package which only contains the readme
> and license files, and simply include those files in both -doc and -devel.
How I can remove the main
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Roman Tsisyk from comment #3)
> > I think you should remove the "main" package which only contains the readme
> > and license files, and simply include those
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #1 from Roman Tsisyk ---
I'm upstream maintainer. My other packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295209
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
Roman Tsisyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
41 matches
Mail list logo