[Bug 1300569] Review Request: langpacks - Langpacks metapackage

2016-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+

[Bug 1300569] Review Request: langpacks - Langpacks metapackage

2016-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen --- Okay thanks Spec URL: http://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/langpacks.spec SRPM URL: http://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/langpacks-1.0-3.fc23.src.rpm -- You are

[Bug 1300569] Review Request: langpacks - Langpacks metapackage

2016-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen --- There should not be any langpacks.noarch package: so can you please remove the final %files section? Also good to add a comment about the %define. Package Review ==

[Bug 1300569] Review Request: langpacks - Langpacks metapackage

2016-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 --- Comment #8 from Parag Nemade --- Spec URL: http://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/langpacks.spec SRPM URL: http://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/langpacks-1.0-2.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1300569] Review Request: langpacks - Langpacks metapackage

2016-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pnemade's scratch build of langpacks-1.0-3.fc23.src.rpm for f24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12700025 -- You

[Bug 1300569] Review Request: langpacks - Langpacks metapackage

2016-01-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 --- Comment #6 from Parag Nemade --- Spec URL: http://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/langpacks.spec SRPM URL: http://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/langpacks-1.0-2.fc23.src.rpm Updated to add information on

[Bug 1300569] Review Request: langpacks - Langpacks metapackage

2016-01-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 --- Comment #5 from Parag Nemade --- okay changed to meta-package and reuploaded same package. I found only one metapackages that is estonianidcard and other one I find git-all a subpackage metapackage. -- You are

[Bug 1300569] Review Request: langpacks - Langpacks metapackage

2016-01-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen --- I don't know if the license matters here: MIT could also be a option though traditionally we have defaulted to GPLv2+ for these kind of packages. I hope we don't need to ship any

[Bug 1300569] Review Request: langpacks - Langpacks metapackage

2016-01-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen --- W: spelling-error metapackage -> meta package, meta-package, prepackage I might vote for "meta-package" (for rpmlint). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1300569] Review Request: langpacks - Langpacks metapackage

2016-01-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 Parag Nemade changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: langpack - |Review Request: