https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Andrea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dynafed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Andrea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: dynafed-|Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #14 from Andrea ---
thanks Adrien!
Fab i have just requested the repo for dynafed, when done i will do the builds
and release it to the testing repos
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #13 from Fabrizio Furano ---
Hey, champagne ! Thank you Adrien !
Does this mean that it's in epel-testing now or that we have to push it ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Adrien Devresse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Fabrizio Furano changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #10 from Fabrizio Furano ---
Hi Adrien,
thank you very much again for the help.
What does this mean ? Do you have a suggestion ?
>FAIL: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #9 from Adrien Devresse ---
Hi Andrea,
Thx for the update:
Build rawhide :
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13922533
PASSED
build epel7 :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Adrien Devresse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #8 from Andrea ---
Hi Adrien,
Fabrizio tagged a new version fixing the problems you found on your initial
review:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #7 from Fabrizio Furano ---
Hi Adrien,
python is used for the authorization. Good point about py26 and epel5. I
remove the requirement...
f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Adrien Devresse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ade...@gmail.com) |
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Fabrizio Furano changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fur...@cern.ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #4 from Adrien Devresse ---
Hi Andrea,
little informal review :
- Please remove the Obsolete, they should be avoided for new packages if not
strictly required.
- BuildRequires: lfc-libs >= 1.8.8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Adrien Devresse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #3 from Andrea ---
new upstream version:
Spec URL:
http://svn.cern.ch/guest/lcgdm/ugr/tags/dynafed_1_2_0/packaging/rpm/specs/dynafed.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Andrea changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #1 from Andrea ---
better Spec URL:
http://svn.cern.ch/guest/lcgdm/ugr/tags/dynafed_1_1_0/packaging/rpm/specs/dynafed.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
19 matches
Mail list logo