[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2017-01-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2017-01-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #28 from Sudhir Khanger --- Can this be closed as sqlcipher is already available now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-08-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- sqlcipher-3.3.1-4.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-08-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- sqlcipher-3.3.1-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5ff49b651b -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- sqlcipher-3.3.1-4.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-068d457ba0 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #23 from Rex Dieter --- Are you planning on submitting updates for f24/f23 to bodhi? (I don't see any yet) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Siddharth Sharma changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/sqlcipher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #19 from Siddharth Sharma --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #17) > re-reading, looks like my item 12 was missing the actual spec suggestion: > ... this helps: > # fix/workaround hard-coded rpaths >

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #18 from Siddharth Sharma --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #17) > re-reading, looks like my item 12 was missing the actual spec suggestion: > ... this helps: > # fix/workaround hard-coded rpaths >

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter --- re-reading, looks like my item 12 was missing the actual spec suggestion: ... this helps: # fix/workaround hard-coded rpaths sed -i

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #16 from Rex Dieter --- Looks good, all the blocker items mentioned previously were addressed. Remaining items to consider: 5. SHOULD document why these compiler flags are needed in a .spec comment

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-07-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner --- Are you interested in some review for mono packages to do a review swap? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-06-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #13 from Raphael Groner --- Are you interested in a review swap? See comment #11. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-06-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #12 from Siddharth Sharma --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #10) > What's your FAS account? Please use the same e-mail address and name for > your Bugzilla account. Otherwise, people have

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-06-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner --- (In reply to Siddharth Sharma from comment #4) > (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #2) > > Hi, > > is there any progress with this package? I could do the official review. >

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-06-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner --- What's your FAS account? Please use the same e-mail address and name for your Bugzilla account. Otherwise, people have trouble to identify you. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-06-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #9 from Siddharth Sharma --- Is anyone looking to do fedora-review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-06-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #8 from Siddharth Sharma --- I anyone looking to do fedora-review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-04-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Siddharth Sharma changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-03-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) | Referenced

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-03-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #5 from Siddharth Sharma --- It would also be good to look at this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 while reviewing new specs in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294#c4

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 --- Comment #4 from Siddharth Sharma --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #2) > Hi, > is there any progress with this package? I could do the official review. new SPEC and SRPM SPEC:

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Siddharth Sharma changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(siddharth.kde@gma |

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-03-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu

[Bug 1310294] Review Request: sqlcipher - An SQLite extension that provides 256 bit AES encryption of database files

2016-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1261614