https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
Petr Viktorin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #19 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-wxpython4. You may commit to the
branch "f27" in about 10 minutes.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #17 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #16)
> spec diff shows no changes.
My bad, I failed to copy into public_html on my server. Fixed now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #16 from Miro Hrončok ---
spec diff shows no changes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #15 from Scott Talbert ---
Fixed all of the above.
Spec URL: https://www.techie.net/~talbert/python-wxpython4.spec
SRPM URL: https://www.techie.net/~talbert/python-wxpython4-4.0.1-3.fc28.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #14 from Miro Hrončok ---
Please add a comment about the license. "wxWidgets and BSD" doesn't provide
enough information.
I've just noticed the docs subpackage. It's common to name it doc, not docs.
Guidelines says it is recommen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #13 from Scott Talbert ---
Okay, I think this should address most of the rpmlint issues, re-enables the
tests (but there are still some that fail, and some that fail only in koji, so
I'm going to leave them || true for now), and ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #12 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #11)
> (In reply to Scott Talbert from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4)
> > > There are wxWidgets in ext/wxWidgets, are those used or not?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #11 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to Scott Talbert from comment #9)
> (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4)
> > There are wxWidgets in ext/wxWidgets, are those used or not? If not, can the
> > folder be deleted, just to make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #10 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7)
> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
> sh-4.4# python3
> Python 3.6.4 (default, Feb 1 2018, 11:03:59)
> [GCC 8.0.1 20180127 (Red Hat 8.0.1-0.6)] on linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #9 from Scott Talbert ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4)
> There are wxWidgets in ext/wxWidgets, are those used or not? If not, can the
> folder be deleted, just to make it clear?
The wxWidgets source isn't used EXCEPT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #8 from Scott Talbert ---
Thanks a lot for the review! I'll get working on your comments.
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)
> Python 2 install uses easy_install, Python 3 uses build.py, is there a
> reason for the differ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok ---
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
sh-4.4# python3
Python 3.6.4 (default, Feb 1 2018, 11:03:59)
[GCC 8.0.1 20180127 (Red Hat 8.0.1-0.6)] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok ---
Created attachment 1394591
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1394591&action=edit
license breakdown
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok ---
Created attachment 1394590
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1394590&action=edit
rpmlint filtered a bit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
License file LICENSE_BSD_Simple.txt is not marked as %license.
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/wxPython-4.0.1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/wx/lib/pubsub/LICENSE_BSD_Simple.txt
/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
What Fedoras/EPELs are you targeting here? Use python2-numpy instead of numpy
if possible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Python 2 install uses easy_install, Python 3 uses build.py, is there a reason
for the difference?
What's up with tests? They seem to be both disabled and || true. Do they fail
totally, or only some fail?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
--- Comment #1 from Scott Talbert ---
Spec URL: https://www.techie.net/~talbert/python-wxpython4.spec
SRPM URL: https://www.techie.net/~talbert/python-wxpython4-4.0.1-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description: wxPython4 is a is a new implementation of wxPyth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
Scott Talbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310434
Scott Talbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|wxPy
23 matches
Mail list logo
