https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
Dmitry Mikhirev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
Mike McCune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|POST
--- Comment #18 from Mike McCune
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
Sat6QE Jenkins changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #17 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Yeah, please look at the example in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec_file. That
macro should be only used conditionally if defined.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #16 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
Yes, but koji tries to build SRPM before installing build dependencies, when
there's no python-macros in chroot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Both python-devel and python3-devel pull in python-macros which provides this
macro. So something else must be going on.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #14 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
>- %python_provide macro should be used
Well, it works fine for local mock builds and for copr builds, but koji fails
to build SRPM because python-devel is not installed in initial chroot and this
macro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/vrpn
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
OK, so it was mock misconfiguration, nss-myhostname was not enabled and
localhost was not resolvable. But it seems that vrpn has a buffer overflow if
the hostname cannot be resolved.
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
The tests fail now:
Start 2: test_vrpn
2: Test command:
/builddir/build/BUILD/vrpn-version_07.33/build/server_src/test_vrpn
2: Test timeout computed to be: 1500
2: vrpn_connect_udp_port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
P, I'll try to use conjunctions that actually make sense
> This is not a packaging issue, but an upstream issue. But vrpn already has a
> config file, so it should simply read whateve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
> 1. Type=simple means that there's no synchronization wrt. to the daemon being
> ready to serve requests. So it's harder to write something that uses the
> daemon because it is necessary to poll for i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
The review does not depend on this, but the spec file is a bit iffy.
It's something that would be nice to fix at some point.
1. Type=simple means that there's no synchronization wrt. to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
Done.
Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/bizdelnick/neuro/vrpn.git/plain/vrpn.spec?id=b012cca025b63dddbd4b80e4378293522d2efd2a
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/res
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Please provide a comment explaining what files are under what license in the
binary RPMS (since you have two licenses)
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
Well, as I figured out MPI support is not implemented in fact
(https://github.com/vrpn/vrpn/blob/version_07.33/vrpn_Connection.C#L5387), and
the only thing that changed after %_openmpi_load was the cmake
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
E.g. gromacs:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/gromacs.git/tree/gromacs.spec.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
> Does -doc really require the main package? Sometimes you just want to read
> the docs without pulling the libraries in.
You are right, it's a mistake. BTW I forgot to make it noarch.
> Why build wit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Does -doc really require the main package? Sometimes you just want to read the
docs without pulling the libraries in.
Why build with openmpi only? Normally MPI packages in Fedora are built i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1315021 (openvibe)
Ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
Dmitry Mikhirev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro)
A
23 matches
Mail list logo
