https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
Marc Deop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
--- Comment #3 from Marc Deop ---
The spec file is still the 5.6.0 one, the src.rpm is updated though.
Reviewing the spec file from
https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/review/grub2-breeze-theme-5.6.2-1.fc23.src.rpm
... everything good fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Vrátil ---
Thanks for review!
Spec URL:
https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/review/grub2-breeze-theme.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/review/grub2-breeze-theme-5.6.2-1.fc23.src.rpm
- up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
--- Comment #1 from Marc Deop ---
- License file (COPYING) in sources says that license should be GPLv3
- Is there any special reason why "%global _grubthemedir" is declared in the
%build section?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
Marc Deop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@marcdeop.com
Assignee|nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
Daniel Vrátil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1135103 (plasma5), 656997