[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- spasm-ng-0.5-0.4.beta.2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-09-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- spasm-ng-0.5-0.4.beta.2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-09-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-09-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- spasm-ng-0.5-0.4.beta.2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- spasm-ng-0.5-0.4.beta.2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- spasm-ng-0.5-0.4.beta.2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-44179d64eb -- You are receiving

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- spasm-ng-0.5-0.4.beta.2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4f36d66bea -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- spasm-ng-0.5-0.4.beta.2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7b735b0d04 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- spasm-ng-0.5-0.4.beta.2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-77c655576c -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/spasm-ng -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #12 from Ben Rosser --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #10 from Ben Rosser --- Oh, my bad, I forgot to amend the License tag to reflect the bundling too. Updated; not bumping the release for this change: Spec URL:

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #9 from Ben Rosser --- I've removed the static libs as part of the %prep stage (they weren't being used as part of the compile process anyway but this way we can be sure of that). I've removed the gmp.h

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo --- Issues: [reply] [−] Description Ben Rosser 2016-04-08 11:40:44 EDT Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/spasm/spasm-ng.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo --- (In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #5) > I will fix the rm -rf %{buildroot} as well. It is still there ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #5 from Ben Rosser --- Oh, whoops. The correct SRPM is fc24, not fc23: Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/spasm/spasm-ng.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo --- I get Error 404 downloading https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/spasm/spasm-ng-0.5-0.3.beta.2.fc23.src.rpm please, fix also the problem reported above -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- Please, remove rm -rf %{buildroot} in %install section -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-08-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it

[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators

2016-07-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #1 from Ben Rosser --- Having thought about the include file situation further... I believe they probably should be removed from the package: Their authorship and copyright is difficult to assert (most of