https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1181081
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
jetbrains-annotations-15.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
jetbrains-annotations-15.0-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5a560d7399
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jetbrains-annotations
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
SCM request:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/5102
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/5103
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Toma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #3)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> > What do you mean?
> I meant that the timestamps issue is also mentioned in guidelines so
> therefore I considered t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Repik ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> What do you mean?
I meant that the timestamps issue is also mentioned in guidelines so therefore
I considered that the guidelines are not met.
> Solved
By solivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #1)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
>
> Issues
> ==
> [!]: Package complies to t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
--- Comment #1 from Tomas Repik ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues
==
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[!]: Packages should try to preserve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1328868
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1328063
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
18 matches
Mail list logo
