https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
--- Comment #10 from William Moreno ---
Hi.
I see than there are builds of this package in f23 and f24 but I do not see a
update in bodhi, please remember to request the update in bodhi.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/commissaire
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
--- Comment #8 from Matthew Barnes ---
Thanks for the quick responses!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
--- Comment #6 from Matthew Barnes ---
Another update to comply (I think) with guidelines for pre-releases.
This satisfies rpmlint's complaint about the invalid version.
SRPM URL:
https://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/commissaire/commissaire
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
--- Comment #5 from Matthew Barnes ---
Updated spec and srpm.
Turns out I was packaging the wrong documentation files. I don't think a
separate -doc subpackage is needed at this time; it's just a few text files.
Switched the package over to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- About the check issu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
John Dulaney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Barnes ---
Hey William, thanks for taking this up.
FYI, I am part of upstream. We mainly develop with python2 and are aiming to
get this in RHEL/CentOS by way of Fedora, hence the focus on python2. But I
can chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
--- Comment #2 from William Moreno ---
I am currious about why you build the docs in %build:
# Build docs
%{__python2} setup.py build_sphinx -c doc -b text
But you only include the source .rst files in %doc, also could be better to
have the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Barnes ---
See also the CLI tool package review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328951
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
Matthew Barnes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: commissaire |Review Request: commissaire
14 matches
Mail list logo
