https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
phototonic-1.7.20-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
phototonic-1.7.20-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
phototonic-1.7.20-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
phototonic-1.7.20-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
phototonic-1.7.20-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
phototonic-1.7.20-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
phototonic-1.7.20-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
phototonic-1.7.20-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-07f631907e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
phototonic-1.7.20-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-acafcbf543
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
phototonic-1.7.20-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-97acfb51b4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
phototonic-1.7.20-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9021abfe13
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/phototonic
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #12 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
I have now sponsored you into the packagers group. You should be able to use
the fedorapeople space now
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org) if you so
desire.
If you do not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #10 from Michael Cullen ---
I only see one issue - the desktop database one. The other thing on the issues
list actually goes against the guidance in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:C_and_C%2B%2B
did I miss one?
Spec UR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #9 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
rpmlint messages are ok. No issues there.
Only two minor issues. Please go through the review in the above comment. Once
those are resolved, I will approve the package and sponsor you.
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #8 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Thank you Michael. I will be out of town tomorrow. Once I am back, I will post
a review.
Thank you for your patience and quick uploads! :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #6 from Michael Cullen ---
Looks like copr git URLs are broken - probably after today's maintainance. I'll
try plan B then.
Spec URL: https://cullen-online.com/phototonic.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/resu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
When you add the links, please add both spec and srpm in the same comment.
Also, thanks for doing the koji build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #4 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
hmmm ... spec url is broken. Can you please fix the link? Make sure it's linked
to "raw" version (not html) so that I can run fedora-review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #3 from Michael Cullen ---
Updated version now upstream have tagged a release properly:
Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/mich181189/phototonic/phototonic.git/plain/phototonic.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #2 from Michael Cullen ---
I've also commented on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332999
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this produ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
--- Comment #1 from Michael Cullen ---
Gah sorry just seen that spec file is the HTML-ified version.
Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/mich181189/phototonic/phototonic.git/plain/phototonic.spec
should be more correct.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
Michael Cullen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
30 matches
Mail list logo
