[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- flatpak-0.6.2-1.fc23, ostree-2016.5-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- flatpak-0.6.2-1.fc24, gnome-software-3.20.2-4.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving t

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- flatpak-0.6.2-1.fc23, ostree-2016.5-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/w

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Matthias

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fed

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- flatpak-0.6.2-1.fc23 ostree-2016.5-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f9167af92a -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- flatpak-0.6.2-1.fc24 gnome-software-3.20.2-4.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8a483bb84c -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/flatpak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about chang

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 Alexander Larsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||al...@redhat.com --- Comment #14

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #12 from David King --- Spec URL: https://amigadave.fedorapeople.org/flatpak.spec SRPM URL: https://amigadave.fedorapeople.org/flatpak-0.6.2-1.fc25.src.rpm Updated SRPM URL for the new 0.6.2 release, and incorporating the env.d di

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #11 from Matthias Clasen --- checklist: package naming: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec legibility: excellent upstream sources: the latest tarbal

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen --- And here is the rpmlint output for the binary rpms: $ rpmlint flatpak-*x86_64.rpm flatpak.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sandboxed -> sandboxes, sand boxed, sand-boxed flatpak.x86_64:

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Clasen --- rpmlint output: $ rpmlint flatpak-0.6.0-1.fc25.src.rpm flatpak.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sandboxed -> sandboxes, sand boxed, sand-boxed 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors,

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mcla...@redhat.com --- Comment #8 f

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcla...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 f

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #6 from David King --- Spec URL: https://amigadave.fedorapeople.org/flatpak.spec SRPM URL: https://amigadave.fedorapeople.org/flatpak-0.6.1-1.fc25.src.rpm Updated SRPM URL for the new 0.6.1 release. -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #5 from David King --- It doesn't seem like this is a problem in practice, as "dnf repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires xdg-app-devel" gives no results (on rawhide). As far as I am aware, only gnome-software has a BuildRequires for x

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa --- The only problem is that "xdg-app-devel" != "xdg-app-devel(x86-64)". Because of that, someone who requires xdg-app-devel will not get the flatpak-devel package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You a

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #3 from David King --- I think that I have the Provides correct now, quoting from : * flatpak provides only xdg-app (no isa) because it's

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from N

[Bug 1337434] Review Request: flatpak - Application deployment framework for desktop apps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337434 --- Comment #1 from David King --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14165505 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this prod