https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #23 from Raphael Groner ---
Request that the Release Engineering team unblock the package for the releases
that the package should be un-retired for via their trac instance. In this
request, please post a link to the completed re-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #22 from MartinKG ---
I have a problem with unretire the package
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/D5BNMGEGDFXAHXQAEB7AARBEKDMGBIYF/
any help ?
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #21 from MartinKG ---
@Raphael Thanks for the review.
new rpm package:
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/guayadeque.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/guayadeque-0.4.1-0.7.beta1git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #20 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #18)
> unbundle wxcurl library is discussed on the
> Fedora Packaging list, Thread: partly bundled wxcurl in package guayadeque
>
> https://lists.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #18 from MartinKG ---
unbundle wxcurl library is discussed on the
Fedora Packaging list, Thread: partly bundled wxcurl in package guayadeque
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
/thread/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #17 from MartinKG ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #16)
> Sorry but I still can not approve.
>
> > [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
> > must be documented in the spec.
>
> P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #16 from Raphael Groner ---
Sorry but I still can not approve.
> [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
> must be documented in the spec.
Please do so. That's MUST.
https://fedoraproject.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #15 from MartinKG ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #12)
> > [?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
> > => Source files without license header, see above.
>
> Licensecheck script fails to det
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner ---
Maybe modify the lang_subpkg macro definition a little bit to include all
variants into one subpackage for the same language code, mind the additional
star character (*) in the last line.
%define
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #13 from MartinKG ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #12)
>
> guayadeque-langpack-sr_latin.noarch: E: incorrect-locale-subdir
> /usr/share/locale/sr_latin/LC_MESSAGES/guayadeque.mo
> guayadeque-langpack-sr_latin.noarch:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner ---
> [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
> must be documented in the spec.
Please do so. That's MUST.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #11 from MartinKG ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/guayadeque.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/guayadeque-0.4.1-0.5.beta1git26eaf8d.fc24.src.rpm
%changelog
* Mon May 30 2016
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #10 from MartinKG ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/guayadeque.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/guayadeque-0.4.1-0.4.beta1git13013ff.fc24.src.rpm
%changelog
* Wed May 25 2016
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #9 from MartinKG ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #7)
> Package Review
> ==
> = MUST items =
> Generic:
> [?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
> other legal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner ---
Created attachment 1161083
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1161083&action=edit
licensecheck.txt for 35561f6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #5 from MartinKG ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #4)
> My suggestion to run a complete new package review. Some general advice:
>
> - Are you sure about all BuildRequires? Why subversion-devel?
done
>
> - You can re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
My suggestion to run a complete new package review. Some general advice:
- Are you sure about all BuildRequires? Why subversion-devel?
- You can remove Group tag, it's obsolete.
- Please provide a prop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #3 from MartinKG ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/guayadeque.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/guayadeque-0.4.1-0.2.beta1gitd2c0281.fc24.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sun May 22 2016
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #2 from MartinKG ---
$ koji list-pkgs --show-blocked --tag f24 --package guayadeque
Package Tag Extra Arches Owner
--- ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #1 from MartinKG ---
I need access for f24 and rawhide branch again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/anonbeat
25 matches
Mail list logo
