https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Pete Walter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(walter.pete@yande |
|x.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #53 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Dhruv Paranjape changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhruvparanjap...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System ---
chrome-gnome-shell-9-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3168b42a6c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #50 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/chrome-gnome-shell
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Chris Sandler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #49 from C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #48 from Pete Walter ---
Thanks Chris! I've filed a chromium ticket for the directory symlink issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463967
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Chris Sandler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Pete Walter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|alexjn...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #46 from Pete Walter ---
This review is stalled and a response is needed soon, as per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews#Reviewer_not_responding
Is there anything left to address, Jeremy?
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #45 from Devin Henderson ---
@Stephen,
FYI, it still works in Epiphany (or "Web"), the GNOME web browser. `sudo dnf
install epiphany`.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #44 from Stephen ---
I'm going to be "that guy" ;) and ask what's happening on this?
GNOME extension management on Fedora has been broken for quite a while now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #43 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
Hello,
Do you think the issues can be fixed to make it available in the repo.
It's a fairly important package now that firefox isn't compatible anymore with
the old plugin :)
Thanks !
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #42 from Pete Walter ---
Not sure what to do with the transaction check error. In chrome-remote-desktop
/etc/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts is a symlink to
../../chromium/native-messaging-hosts which of course breaks this packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #41 from Jeremy Newton ---
I assume this is because of the double owned dir?
@Pete I guess this would be another blocking issue too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #40 from Serge Matveenko ---
Guys, I'm sorry if this is already addressed. I've just noticed that
`chrome-gnome-shell` package from `region51-chrome-gnome-shell` repo conflicts
with `chrome-remote-desktop` package from `updates`.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #39 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Yuri Konotopov from comment #38)
> Pete,
>
> Native host manifest location is well documented by Mozilla [1] and "lib" is
> arch-independent. It should be properly placed to /usr/share (and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #38 from Yuri Konotopov ---
Pete,
Native host manifest location is well documented by Mozilla [1] and "lib" is
arch-independent. It should be properly placed to /usr/share (and this location
was documented early), but this is not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #37 from Pete Walter ---
Are there any blockers left I need to address?
I'm happy to change it to noarch if that's the upstream guidance, but at the
same time I don't think there's anything wrong if it's archful either. Right
now
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #36 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Pete Walter from comment #35)
> (In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #33)
> > More inline comments:
> >
> > (In reply to Pete Walter from comment #31)
> > > This is not needed these days.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #35 from Pete Walter ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #33)
> More inline comments:
>
> (In reply to Pete Walter from comment #31)
> > This is not needed these days. gtk3 includes a file trigger that does it
> > automati
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #34 from Yuri Konotopov ---
(In reply to Pete Walter from comment #31)
> > >Does the FF plugin have to be placed in /usr/lib64/mozilla for a 64bit
> > >system? or will it work just as fine in /usr/lib/mozilla? If it needs the
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #33 from Jeremy Newton ---
More inline comments:
(In reply to Pete Walter from comment #31)
> Thanks Jeremy! I've put my replies inline.
>
>
> (In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #29)
> > Package Review
> > ==
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #31 from Pete Walter ---
Thanks Jeremy! I've put my replies inline.
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #29)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #32 from Pete Walter ---
* Fri Mar 10 2017 Pete Walter - 8.2-2
- Package review fixes (#1343710)
- Validate the desktop file
- Don't own /etc/opt directory
- Depend on mozilla-filesystem instead of co-owning mozilla directories
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #30 from Mark Harfouche ---
@Pete, Jeremy, thank you for working on this.
@Pete, I understand you might have thought that it was better to continue from
your own spec file, but there had been some work by Maxim and I that was don
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #29 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #28 from Jeremy Newton ---
Sounds good, I'll take a look at reviewing it this weekend.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
Pete Walter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|chrome
31 matches
Mail list logo
