https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344410
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344410
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Josh Stone from comment #3)
> > hm, there is only 2 binaries with small size. is it worth to make libs
> > subpackage?
>
> I can't find official guidelines on this,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344410
--- Comment #3 from Josh Stone ---
> hm, there is only 2 binaries with small size. is it worth to make libs
> subpackage?
I can't find official guidelines on this, but I prefer to avoid installing
things in /bin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344410
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Josh Stone from comment #1)
> Preliminary review:
>
> - Shouldn't the library go in a separate subpackage? The executables won't
> be needed for library users. I'd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344410
--- Comment #1 from Josh Stone ---
Preliminary review:
- Shouldn't the library go in a separate subpackage? The executables won't be
needed for library users. I'd expect one of these layouts:
- hoedown, hoedown-libs,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344410
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||915043
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344410
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||hoedown
--