https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #34 from Mattia Verga ---
I've received no response, so I've filed a request to releng to orphan the
package: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10205
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #32 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to tatyana from comment #31)
> Thank you for the information.
>
> Just to clarify this package was released as part of RedHat 7.3. There is
> another libi40iw bug report (id=1381746) which targe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #31 from tatyana ---
Thank you for the information.
Just to clarify this package was released as part of RedHat 7.3. There is
another libi40iw bug report (id=1381746) which targets RehHat 7.4. We are still
working on preparing pat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #30 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to tatyana from comment #29)
> I thought that this package has been released and no further action was
> required. I don't know who needs to update the bug status.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
tatyana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tatyana.e.nikolov |
|a...@intel.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #27 from Jarod Wilson ---
Ah, the problem was that the bug was still assigned to my RH login instead of
the one I have on file with the Fedora package database. I'm updating some
permissions on the package now, so you can build for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #26 from tatyana ---
Ok, I see the package request has been approved. Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #25 from tatyana ---
Now the sync is working. Which collection should I choose?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libi40iw
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ja...@redhat.com|jarodwil...@gmail.com
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #23 from tatyana ---
Yeah, that too is an issue.
I am trying to submit a new package request, but when I enter the ticket number
= bugzilla id = 1350029 and click sync, I get "Review not approved by the
assignee of the ticket jarod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #22 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to tatyana from comment #21)
> Apparently, I need to fix the ticket number - should I send another package
> request. Is there a way to edit the first one?
Just gave it a try myself, I think the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #21 from tatyana ---
Apparently, I need to fix the ticket number - should I send another package
request. Is there a way to edit the first one?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #20 from tatyana ---
I submitted a new package request:
•user: tatyana request package: libi40iw-0.5.225-1.el7.src.rpm on branch master
I am not sure if branch master was the right one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #19 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to tatyana from comment #18)
> My username is tatyana
Ah, wasn't in the packager group yet, and I was apparently only looking within
that group. I've added you to the group and sponsored you now
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #18 from tatyana ---
My username is tatyana
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #17 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to tatyana from comment #14)
> I have an account in the Fedora Account System. Let me know if more actions
> on my part are required.
What is your FAS username? I'm struggling to find it at the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #16 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #15)
> Unfortunately it's not yet good package.
>
> > %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> MUST be dropped
This isn't a "MUST" from my reading of things.
> > %clean
> > rm -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ignate...@redhat.com
--- Comment #15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #14 from tatyana ---
I have an account in the Fedora Account System. Let me know if more actions on
my part are required.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
Jarod Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jarodwil...@gmail.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
Jarod Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #11 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to tatyana from comment #10)
> Assuming the auto-generated files got messed up, I rebuilt the package. I
> didn't change the version and there aren't source changes. Could you let me
> know if th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #10 from tatyana ---
Assuming the auto-generated files got messed up, I rebuilt the package. I
didn't change the version and there aren't source changes. Could you let me
know if the issue above is resolved.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #9 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to tatyana from comment #8)
> The package is updated. The new version libi40iw-0.5.225.tar.gz is available
> at the URL provided above. All the changes can be viewed in the public git
> repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #8 from tatyana ---
The package is updated. The new version libi40iw-0.5.225.tar.gz is available at
the URL provided above. All the changes can be viewed in the public git
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #7 from tatyana ---
[!]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
Note: No (noreplace) in %config /etc/libibverbs.d/i40iw.driver
The file /etc/libibverbs.d/i40iw.driver contains the driver name to be use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #6 from Jarod Wilson ---
Using fedora-review's template, with notes added after anything marked as
!/fail:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
tatyana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tatyana.e.nikolov |
|a...@intel.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
Jarod Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tatyana.e.nikol...@intel.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #3 from Jarod Wilson ---
Some further reading on the licensing issue and a bit of back-channel
discussion, and what I now believe to be the thing to do for #7 is "License:
GPLv2 or BSD", rename COPYING to LICENSE-GPL and include a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #2 from Jarod Wilson ---
Okay, I've done an initial pass through the spec, and a few things of note to
take care of:
1) There's mixed use of both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. These two are
equivalent, but it's preferred that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
Jarod Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
36 matches
Mail list logo
