https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Bug 1357204 depends on bug 1290790, which changed state.
Bug 1290790 Summary: spock-1.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290790
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Mat Booth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Bug 1357204 depends on bug 1290790, which changed state.
Bug 1290790 Summary: spock-1.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290790
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Bug 1357204 depends on bug 1290790, which changed state.
Bug 1290790 Summary: spock-1.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290790
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1442391
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Bug 1357204 depends on bug 1397307, which changed state.
Bug 1397307 Summary: Gradle 3.3.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397307
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Tracking
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner ---
Okay, let's wait till those things got sorted out.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #9)
> Gil,
> how far is upstream development with JUnit5?
Have no time for J5 now, is available a new milestone (r5.0.0-M3)
but we could try to import only after
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner ---
Gil,
how far is upstream development with JUnit5?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment #8 from Raphael
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Complete list othe JDK files under GPLv2 with exceptions license:
./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AgentInitializationException.java
./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AgentLoadException.java
./main/src/com/sun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 1180493
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1180493&action=edit
licensecheck.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Apache (v2.0)", "GPL (v
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #2)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
> > you must add: Provides: bundled(objectweb-asm) = 5.0.3
> > maybe 5.0.3 is not the correct asm release but for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
> you must add: Provides: bundled(objectweb-asm) = 5.0.3
> maybe 5.0.3 is not the correct asm release but for me is not a problem
Can we unbundle? I based on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
you must add: Provides: bundled(objectweb-asm) = 5.0.3
maybe 5.0.3 is not the correct asm release but for me is not a problem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Alias
21 matches
Mail list logo
