[Bug 1359224] Review Request: rubygem-turbolinks-source - Turbolinks JavaScript assets

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359224 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1359224] Review Request: rubygem-turbolinks-source - Turbolinks JavaScript assets

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359224 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-turbolinks-source -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1359224] Review Request: rubygem-turbolinks-source - Turbolinks JavaScript assets

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359224 Jun Aruga changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --

[Bug 1359224] Review Request: rubygem-turbolinks-source - Turbolinks JavaScript assets

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359224 --- Comment #3 from Jun Aruga --- Okay for lib/assets/javascripts/turbolinks.js > > Why is turbolinks-rails related on turbolinks-source? > > Not sure I understand this question ... I means that I did not think the

[Bug 1359224] Review Request: rubygem-turbolinks-source - Turbolinks JavaScript assets

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359224 --- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to Jun Aruga from comment #1) > > # We don't have js-turbolinks in Fedora yet and it would be quite demmanding > > # to unbundle it :/ Anyway, I started discussion with

[Bug 1359224] Review Request: rubygem-turbolinks-source - Turbolinks JavaScript assets

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359224 --- Comment #1 from Jun Aruga --- > # We don't have js-turbolinks in Fedora yet and it would be quite demmanding > # to unbundle it :/ Anyway, I started discussion with upstream on this topic. > #

[Bug 1359224] Review Request: rubygem-turbolinks-source - Turbolinks JavaScript assets

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359224 Jun Aruga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED