https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
Andrew Schorr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #24 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gawkextlib
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
Andrew Schorr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--- Comment #22 from A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Schorr ---
I should also note that not all gawk extension libraries will require
gawkextlib. It is an optional support library. So we cannot rely upon solving
the problem that way. I guess you are saying that the ne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Schorr ---
Hi Dee'Kej,
Maybe I am confused, but on my Fedora 26 laptop with gawkextlib and gawk-xml
installed, I see this:
[schorr@ajs-t530 ~]$ rpm --requires -q gawkextlib
/sbin/ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig
gawk
libc.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #19 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] ---
Hello Andy,
first to start - we need to take into account that rpmbuild is actually quite
clever regarding the automatic detection of library requirements. If the
gawk-xml will be build against
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Schorr ---
Hi David,
Just as I thought we were all set to go, I realized that there is a subtle
versioning issue here. We are soon going to release gawk version 4.2, and that
versions bumps the major API version fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jskar...@redhat.com
Blo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #17 from Andrew J. Schorr ---
I updated the URL in the spec file to say https instead of http. I uploaded a
new tarball, spec file, and source rpm.
Thanks,
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #16 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] ---
(In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #15)
> (In reply to David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] from comment #13)
> > Okay, so for some reason the SHA256 hashes still don't match for the package
> > I have down
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #15 from Kamil Dudka ---
(In reply to David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] from comment #13)
> Okay, so for some reason the SHA256 hashes still don't match for the package
> I have downloaded and the package fedore-review has downloaded.
>
> Ho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #14 from Andrew J. Schorr ---
I guess this is probably due to changes in the spec file over time. I just
uploaded a new version of:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/gawkextlib/files/gawkextlib-1.0.2.tar.gz
I believe that this sho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #13 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] ---
Okay, so for some reason the SHA256 hashes still don't match for the package I
have downloaded and the package fedore-review has downloaded.
However, doing manual check on both of these sources,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #12 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] ---
Sorry for the delay, I was struggling to run fedora-review tool because of BZ
#1350930. Anyway, I made it to work, so here are the rest of necessary
formalities...
rpmlint result (specfile):
===
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #11 from Andrew J. Schorr ---
Thanks. I updated the files in
https://sourceforge.net/projects/gawkextlib/files/rpms/
Actually, I updated the gawkextlib.spec file, and I uploaded a new version of
the source rpm built now on Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1281075 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #9 from Andrew J. Schorr ---
Created attachment 1281118
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1281118&action=edit
gawkextlib.spec
Here is my latest version. It should be the same as yours except for the
description.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #8 from Andrew J. Schorr ---
(In reply to David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] from comment #6)
> Created attachment 1281075 [details]
> gawextlib.spec
>
> Here's the specfile with the changes I've proposed, and slightly adjusted
> indentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
Andrew J. Schorr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ajschorr@alumni.p |
|rinceton.edu)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #6 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] ---
Created attachment 1281075
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1281075&action=edit
gawextlib.spec
Here's the specfile with the changes I've proposed, and slightly adjusted
indenta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ajschorr@alumni.princeton.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
Andrew J. Schorr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aschorr@telemetry-investmen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
--- Comment #3 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #2 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] ---
So, I will lay down some questions/notes regarding the package, as they will
come during the review:
0) Is this project already packaged for some other distributions? Which ones?
Could you please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Schorr ---
FYI, I updated the spec file to make this minor change:
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Release:1%{?dist}
License: GPLv3+
Group: Development/Libraries
URL: http://sourceforge.net/projec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412
Andrew Schorr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced B
31 matches
Mail list logo
