https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
openhft-affinity-3.0.6-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
openhft-affinity-3.0.6-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cf544dace8
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/openhft-affinity
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7604
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7605
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
@Ben, need something else to finish the review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #3)
> Issues:
> ===
> - There are some Apache 2.0 licensed source files; the license should be
> appended accordingly if they're actually being
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
--- Comment #3 from Ben Rosser ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- There are some Apache 2.0 licensed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rosser@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openhft-affinity.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openhft-affinity-3.0.6-1.fc24.src.rpm
- disable JNI library on ARM arch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1366843
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1353904
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1353905
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||485251
19 matches
Mail list logo