https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
Gergely Polonkai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
Feng Yu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rainwood...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
--- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Yep, looks like an upgrade is needed. Probably some recent git snapshot would
be good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
--- Comment #7 from Gergely Polonkai ---
Yes, upstream has been already upgraded to 0.32, and as F24 already has Vala
0.32, maybe I should also upgrade this package (as valadoc follows vala's
version numbers, obviously)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
It seems to be a vala version problem.
On F23:
checking for valac... /usr/bin/valac
checking whether /usr/bin/valac is at least version 0.15.1... yes
checking for LIBGVC... yes
checking for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
--- Comment #5 from Gergely Polonkai ---
That's exactly the strange part, I had successful mock and koji builds. Still,
I'm already looking into it, I hope I can provide a working package soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
The SRPM doesn't need to be rebuilt: the result is (except in some special
cases) the same, no matter what the build host.
The binary RPMs should be built on rawhide (in mock, see
https://fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
--- Comment #3 from Gergely Polonkai ---
It's a bit strange, as the files are the same as in the old ticket… I will take
a look into it and get back with the results.
Also, should I build on Fedora 24 now it is out? The old SRPM was built on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Created attachment 1191731
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1191731&action=edit
log from failed build in fedora-rawhide-x86_64 mock
I tried to build the updated package, b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
Bug 1367115 depends on bug 988667, which changed state.
Bug 988667 Summary: Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala
project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
What|Removed |Ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
--- Comment #1 from Gergely Polonkai ---
*** Bug 988667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and com
13 matches
Mail list logo