https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski ---
So, python3-cryptography 1.7.2 is now in EPEL7. So we can get 17.0.0 in. If
we update it to 1.9 we could get in 17.3.0, see bug #1540756.
https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-pyOpenSSL.spe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #10 from Jim Perrin ---
Okay. In order to do this, we'll need a python3-cryptography package.
python-cryptography is tagged for epel7, but is also a base package. What would
you recommend to move forward? Adapting the existing pyth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #11 from Orion Poplawski ---
We will need a separate python3-cryptography package just like you are doing
for python3-PyOpenSSL.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski ---
The trick is that we need to maintain API stability in EPEL. No idea how well
pyOpenSSL does with that. So it's worth some thought as to what version goes
in initially.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #8 from Jim Perrin ---
The newer version (16.1.0) has some updated BuildRequires that I need to work
through. Would it be possible to proceed with the current el7 version, and I'll
work to bump to the newer version afterward?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski ---
It's definitely a bit of a mixed bag (especially since some packages are
python3 only like this one and some are mixed) - but for the most part we've
been treating the python3 stack in EPEL7 as completel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #6 from Jim Perrin ---
Correct. I was intentionally matching what available for python 2.x in the base
distro (and initially starting from that srpm). I wanted to keep the
features/function consistent between the two. If we want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski ---
actually the latest is 16.1.0.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|Package R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #3 from Jim Perrin ---
Changes made, updated spec and packages are now in
https://people.centos.org/jperrin/python3-pyOpenSSL/
if you'd care to take another look.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #2 from Jim Perrin ---
Thanks for taking a look at this.
It's reasonably minimal editing from the base el7 pyOpenSSL src.rpm, so I take
no responsibility for the lack of license file. If it's in the el7 srpm, I'll
see about makin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
Jim Perrin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Package Review |Package Review
Version|rawhide
13 matches
Mail list logo
