https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/bitstream
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9)
> maybe you should update license field, if mpeg/psi/psi.h is under MIT
> (style) license
Right, I've lost this change apparently, I will update befo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
maybe you should update license field, if mpeg/psi/psi.h is under MIT (style)
license
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/bitstream.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/bitstream-1.1-2.fc26.src.rpm
Description: Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
> [!]: Development files must be in a -devel package
> Maybe should be change "Provides: %{name}-devel =
> %{version}-%{release}" in "Provides: %{nam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
NON blocking issues:
"Group:" fields are no more necessary. Please remove
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: bitstream : /usr/include/bitstream/atsc/a52.h bitstream :
/usr/include/bitstream/common.h bitstream :
/usr/include/bitstream/dvb/ci.h bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
Depen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Blocked FE-Legal because the header contains structures related to possibly
patented format. I expect it's more around mux than codec, but need to be
confirmed. Also there is no implementation.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||182235 (FE-Legal)
Refere
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1376438
Referenced Bugs:
16 matches
Mail list logo
