[Bug 1381507] Review Request: darktable2 - Utility to organize and develop raw images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1381507] Review Request: darktable2 - Utility to organize and develop raw images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507 --- Comment #8 from Oliver Haessler --- (In reply to Germano Massullo from comment #4) > https://fedorapeople.org/~germano/package_reviews/darktable2_epel7/ > darktable2.spec >

[Bug 1381507] Review Request: darktable2 - Utility to organize and develop raw images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507 --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember --- I think this applies mostly to libraries in order to keep ABI/API stable in EPEL. I don't think the policy is meant to keep leaf desktop apps on old, unsupported versions forever. --

[Bug 1381507] Review Request: darktable2 - Utility to organize and develop raw images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507 --- Comment #6 from Germano Massullo --- (In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #5) > Wouldn't it make sense to just update the existing darktable package to 2.0? > I am not sure it's worth keeping around both 1.x

[Bug 1381507] Review Request: darktable2 - Utility to organize and develop raw images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507 Kalev Lember changed: What|Removed |Added CC||klem...@redhat.com

[Bug 1381507] Review Request: darktable2 - Utility to organize and develop raw images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507 --- Comment #4 from Germano Massullo --- https://fedorapeople.org/~germano/package_reviews/darktable2_epel7/darktable2.spec

[Bug 1381507] Review Request: darktable2 - Utility to organize and develop raw images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507 --- Comment #3 from Oliver Haessler --- to get rid of the .gitignore file we just need to add the second rm: # Remove bundled lua rm -rf src/external/lua/ # Remove .gitignore file rm -f

[Bug 1381507] Review Request: darktable2 - Utility to organize and develop raw images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507 --- Comment #2 from Germano Massullo --- Downgrading to 2.0.5 due upstream request (Nikon support broken in 2.0.6) https://fedorapeople.org/~germano/package_reviews/darktable2_epel7/darktable2.spec

[Bug 1381507] Review Request: darktable2 - Utility to organize and develop raw images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507 --- Comment #1 from Germano Massullo --- There should not be problems in the spec file since it has already been reviewed when darktable 2 landed into Fedora repositories

[Bug 1381507] Review Request: darktable2 - Utility to organize and develop raw images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507 Germano Massullo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1381507] Review Request: darktable2 - Utility to organize and develop raw images

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507 Oliver Haessler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oli...@redhat.com