https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
hot-tux-0.3.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
hot-tux-0.3.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
hot-tux-0.3.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
hot-tux-0.3.1-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-81ec38f9e1
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
hot-tux-0.3.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fd60530018
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
hot-tux-0.3.1-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5079471824
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jva...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/hot-tux
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #14 from jiri vanek ---
ty!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #11 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #9)
> (In reply to yunying.sun from comment #7)
> > > %autosetup -n %{name}-%{name}-%{version}
> > Is the duplicate %{name} intentional?
>
> Yes it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #10 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to yunying.sun from comment #8)
> Note that I'm a not-approved packager too, having 2 packages waiting for
> approval: bug 1369708 and 1369720. Would appreciate if a swap-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #9 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to yunying.sun from comment #7)
> > %autosetup -n %{name}-%{name}-%{version}
> Is the duplicate %{name} intentional?
Yes it is. It is how github generates src tarballs from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #8 from yunying@intel.com ---
Note that I'm a not-approved packager too, having 2 packages waiting for
approval: bug 1369708 and 1369720. Would appreciate if a swap-review is
possible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
yunying@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yunying@intel.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #6 from jiri vanek ---
fixed:
Spec URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/hot-tux/r3/hot-tux.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/hot-tux/r3/hot-tux-0.3.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Graphical CPU
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #4 from jiri vanek ---
> Incorrect version in %changelog.
fixed
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #3)
> You should build-require `sed' (called from the spec file), `coreutils'
> (called from Makefile). And
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
--- Comment #2 from jiri vanek ---
Thanx! I will fix it with other issues flowing from review.
As for scratches - I built it on all architectures, but scracthbuilds have very
short live, so it do not have sense to put them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@sub-pop.net
---
26 matches
Mail list logo