https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
daq-2.0.6-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
daq-2.0.6-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
daq-2.0.6-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-aa3ba5ce3e
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
daq-2.0.6-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6fefc97dbe
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/daq
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #14 from marcindulak ---
thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #12 from marcindulak ---
I use %{__make} instead of %{make_build} and it builds
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16477244
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #11 from marcindulak ---
Hmm, it may be parallel make is the source of the failure - investigating
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/45159
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #10 from marcindulak ---
Does not compile
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6248/16476248/build.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande ---
> ExcludeArch: %{ix86}
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16476436
Does not work on 32-bit?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #8 from marcindulak ---
Spec URL: http://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/daq/r04/daq.spec
SRPM URL:
http://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/daq/r04/daq-2.0.6-1.fc23.src.rpm
(In reply to Antonio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande ---
>- dap does not build globally on rawhide:
Sorry, i meant 'daq'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
>> - Files in sfbpf/ are licensed under BSD*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #5 from marcindulak ---
Spec URL: http://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/daq/r03/daq.spec
SRPM URL:
http://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/daq/r03/daq-2.0.6-1.fc23.src.rpm
thanks, my answers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
- Files in sfbpf/ are licensed under BSD*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #3 from marcindulak ---
The workarounds were seemingly not working due to local mock cache used during
fedora-review so old daq RPMS were installed ...
The version below is ready for review:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #2 from marcindulak ---
example koji build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16424811
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #1 from marcindulak ---
Problems reported by fedora-review:
daq.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libsfbpf.so.0.0.1
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
daq.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
23 matches
Mail list logo