https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
--- Comment #7 from Fl@sh ---
New version with more control of restoring system settings.
Spec URL: https://f1ash.fedorapeople.org/DNSCryptClient/DNSCryptClient.spec
SRPM URL:
https://f1ash.fedorapeople.org/DNSCryptClient/DNSCryptClient-1.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
--- Comment #6 from Fl@sh ---
INFO for reviewer or testers: after application using need RESTORE system
resolver settings. Click 'Restore' (third) button for it or restore resolv.conf
manually.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
--- Comment #5 from Fl@sh ---
ok, dropped from summary and added to description.
Spec URL: https://f1ash.fedorapeople.org/DNSCryptClient/DNSCryptClient.spec
SRPM URL:
https://f1ash.fedorapeople.org/DNSCryptClient/DNSCryptClient-1.0.0-2.fc26.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter ---
compromise: drop from summary, include in description if you insist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and comp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
It's a slippery slope (I shudder thinking if *all* packages mentioned largely
irrelevant technical details), but I can understand your point of view even if
I disagree with it.
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ---
And I think this is actually essential information and the main reason why I
would pick one application over another doing the same thing. I don't like your
removal of these mentions at all.
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
Fl@sh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Referenced Bugs:
https
