https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
ecryptfs-simple-2016.11.16.1-3.fc25, zulucrypt-5.1.0-3.fc25 has been pushed to
the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of
it in this bug report.
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
ecryptfs-simple-2016.11.16.1-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
ecryptfs-simple-2016.11.16.1-3.fc25, zulucrypt-5.1.0-3.fc25 has been pushed to
the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.
See https://fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
ecryptfs-simple-2016.11.16.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
zulucrypt-5.1.0-3.fc25 ecryptfs-simple-2016.11.16.1-3.fc25 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d3ed084484
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
ecryptfs-simple-2016.11.16.1-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-14e1c5870c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
ecryptfs-simple-2016.11.16.1-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-077a3a307d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
ecryptfs-simple-2016.11.16.1-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-948b76f5ce
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #10 from Raphael Gr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ecryptfs-simple
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Rex D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(projects.rg@smart |
|.ms)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter ---
for item 4, in case you're unfamiliar with %attr usage, see:
http://rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter ---
naming: ok
sources: ok
09d747c5bf7e071f10c3b0833dd3400b ecryptfs-simple.2016.11.16.1.tar.xz
1. hardended_build, agree with sentiments so far, including the macro here
serves no useful purpose, SHOULD remo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ---
Fedora-review could use some bug reports for these. I'm not sure who is
working on it these days and sadly I don't have the time to fix it up.
%_hardened_build is set by default on all active Fedora rel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Yunying Sun from comment #1)
> (This is an un-official review from a new packager)
>
> 1.
> > %global _hardened_build
> Seems _hardened_build is set as default starting from Fedora 23, acco
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
Yunying Sun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yunying@intel.com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402590
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
24 matches
Mail list logo
