[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Dan Radez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Alan Pevec (Fedora) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #23 from Alan

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Alan Pevec (Fedora) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Alan Pevec (Fedora) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ape...@gmail.com, |

needinfo canceled: [Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Alan Pevec (Fedora) has canceled Package Review 's request for Alan Pevec (Fedora) 's needinfo: Bug 1407000: Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #20 from Dan Radez --- Sure thing, I'll take some time today to get the conflict put in to get it moved forward. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #19 from Javier Peña --- My understanding from https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/671#comment-436821 is that we can go ahead with the package, declaring an explicit Conflicts: (as it is done in the

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1327635, 1373513|

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1418855 | Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1418855 Referenced

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #18 from Alan Pevec --- Asked nicely in https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2531 got nice reply in https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/671#comment:4 so we are proceeding with Conflicts: solution in this review, while

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #17 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to Alan Pevec from comment #16) > This matches 2nd case, name conflict of not compatible libs : >

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #16 from Alan Pevec --- This matches 2nd case, name conflict of not compatible libs : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Library_Name_Conflicts Guideline requires to ask one of the upstreams to

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-PuLP - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: python-pulp |Review Request:

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #15 from Dan Radez --- I've updated these files according to Haikel's recommendation: https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-PuLP.spec https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-PuLP-1.6.1-2.fc25.src.rpm -- You are

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Haïkel Guémar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(hgue...@redhat.co |

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Haïkel Guémar changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #12 from Alan Pevec --- One more thing, sorry for more ping-pong, naming of py2/3 version of binaries is not following https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Naming If shipping both, they need to be

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #11 from Dan Radez --- Updated these links: https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-pulp.spec https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-pulp-1.6.1-2.fc25.src.rpm license is now set to just MIT -- You are receiving

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #10 from Alan Pevec --- ok, fedora-review is not that smart "MIT/X11 (BSD like)" is not listed at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Software_License_List It should be simply License: MIT LICENSE text

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #9 from Dan Radez --- Updated these links: https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-pulp.spec https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-pulp-1.6.1-2.fc25.src.rpm license is now set to MIT/X11 (BSD like) -- You are

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #7 from Dan Radez --- Great, in that case let's use these links to proceed: https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-pulp.spec https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-pulp-1.6.1-2.fc25.src.rpm

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #6 from Alan Pevec --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Python_modules suggests "take into account the name of the module used when importing it in Python scripts" In

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #5 from Dan Radez --- Actually just put both versions up there for which ever way is decided to be used: https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-pulp.spec

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #4 from Dan Radez --- I agree with you that I would prefer the lower case. The upstream appears to use lowercase. Though, there is already a project called pulp in fedora, dnf search pulp shows a couple dozen

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #3 from Alan Pevec --- fedora-review complains about spec/SRPM name diff: - Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. Note: python-pulp.spec should be python-PuLP.spec

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ape...@gmail.com --

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 Dan Radez changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1327635, 1373513

[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000 --- Comment #1 from Dan Radez --- Koji Build here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17021666 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about