https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
ufw-0.35-7.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems
still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||ufw
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|ufw |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
ufw-0.35-7.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
ufw-0.35-7.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3d78690ce9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
ufw-0.35-7.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fcf1e0af21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||ufw
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ufw
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler ---
Thanks! Package creation requested in pkgdb.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #8 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler ---
Spec URL:
https://svn.calcforge.org/viewvc/kannolo/trunk/packages/ufw/ufw.spec?revision=259=co
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
fedora-review picked up some concerning things:
ufw.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ufw/after.init 640
ufw.noarch: E: non-executable-script /etc/ufw/after.init 640 /bin/sh
ufw.noarch: E:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler ---
Spec URL:
https://svn.calcforge.org/viewvc/kannolo/trunk/packages/ufw/ufw.spec?revision=258=co
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler ---
> * Could you please use the official sources from the Launchpad project? It
> appears to be available at:
> https://launchpad.net/ufw/0.35/0.35/+download/ufw-0.35.tar.gz
I'll fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Some initial notes:
* Could you please use the official sources from the Launchpad project? It
appears to be available at:
https://launchpad.net/ufw/0.35/0.35/+download/ufw-0.35.tar.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409241
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
fedora-review cannot process the spec URL you've given me. While I'm using
fedora-review in srpm only mode, please, in the future, publish spec files in a
way that fedora-review can
21 matches
Mail list logo