https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
Milan Bouchet-Valat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #29 from Orion Poplawski ---
I think I'm good, so go ahead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #28 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Thanks. I've pushed my patches. Do you need anything more, or should we trigger
a build?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #27 from Orion Poplawski ---
Done. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #26 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Sorry for the delay. I don't really care about where things are installed as
long as I can build Julia with the package. Can you upload your version of the
package to git? Then
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #25 from Orion Poplawski ---
My updated install_dirs.patch doesn't quite work with your current -2 llvm
package. I get:
CMake Error at /usr/lib64/cmake/llvm3.9/LLVMConfig.cmake:165 (include):
include could
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #24 from Orion Poplawski ---
Here's my current version:
https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/llvm3.9.spec
https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/llvm3.9-3.9.1-4.el7.src.rpm
* Fri Feb 10 2017 Orion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #23 from Orion Poplawski ---
It's really not that different from how we handle MPI packages:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI
What would really be good to do is to have clang's CMakeLists.txt do:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #22 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
I don't like the idea of putting everything under /lib64/llvm3.9. That probably
doesn't follow the FHS, even if we add symlinks. It took me quite some work to
improve LLVM's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski ---
Here is my current spec that installs into prefix:
https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/llvm3.9.spec
I've also kept the versioned binaries for everything except llvm-config.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #20 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
I haven't had the time to look in depth to this, but it looks like the
incorrect LLVMConfing.cmake path should be fixed upstream. I think there's even
a CMake variable for this,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #19 from Orion Poplawski ---
Well, my attempt at installing into will not work with current llvm-config if
we want to keep the llvm-%{major_version} names in /usr/bin. Multi-lib
requires those names to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #18 from Orion Poplawski ---
And now looking at 3.9 -
/usr/lib64/cmake/llvm3.9/LLVMExports.cmake:set(_IMPORT_PREFIX "/usr")
leads to errors like:
CMake Error at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #17 from Orion Poplawski ---
Here are the issues I've encountered trying to use llvm3.X, including building
clang3.X with llvm3.X:
- clang wants to find 'llvm-config', but currently this is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #16 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
I don't understand what you mean. We don't currently move libraries around, we
just pass the needed paths to configure/cmake. My patch against the CMake
system ensures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #15 from Orion Poplawski ---
My bad - I got confused with too many different versions at the same time.
I've been playing around with trying to build a versioned clang with the
versioned llvm packages (you've
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #14 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Are you sure? I just downloaded the SRPM again, and the .spec file calls
%cmake, not ./configure.
Update on progress: the patch is still being reviewed upstream. If that takes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski ---
I don't think the content of
https://nalimilan.fedorapeople.org/llvm3.9-3.9.1-2.fc24.src.rpm is correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski ---
This package doesn't build for me:
+ ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
--program-prefix= --disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #11 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
No, it doesn't contain clang. Indeed it's a separate package since 3.7 AFAICT,
so somebody will have to package it separately. Note that since the port to
CMake, versioned
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/llvm3.9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #8 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Yes, for now rawhide has 3.9.0, but I expect F26 to ship with 4.0, which will
be released in February. So indeed for the next few weeks it's going to be
redundant, but I figured
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen ---
Just for the record llvm 3.9.0 is already in Rawhide since end of Nov.
Or maybe do you still need llvm3.9 for current releases?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #6 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
No worries.
Here's the Koji build on all arches:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17155580
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #4 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Kevin: I'm fine with going through a review, but I was told the contrary for
llvm3.7, and the rules at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski ---
llvm3.9.spec:35: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 35, tab: line
10)
I think -static is missing:
Requires: %{name}-devel%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
No
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: The package must be reviewed
and fedora-review flag set to + before you can request the package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #1 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
I've just filed an SCM admin request.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
Milan Bouchet-Valat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
32 matches
Mail list logo